2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2010.09212.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of fluorodeoxyglucose positron‐emission tomography with computed tomography for staging of urothelial carcinoma

Abstract: histopathology was used as the reference standard to compare the sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET/CT and standard CT in detecting UBC and pelvic lymph node metastasis. Furthermore, 36 patients with ≥ 6 months of follow-up imaging were considered to describe the progression of UC and extrapelvic positive FDG-PET/CT images. RESULTSFor the detection of primary UBC, FDG-PET/ CT was slightly more sensitive than CT (85% vs 77%) but less specific (25% vs 50%). For the detection of pelvic node metastasis FDG-PET… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
89
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
89
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The diagnostic performances of 18 F-FDG PET-CT for lymph node staging and/or detection of distant metastases in bladder cancer are better than those of standard CT. [23][24][25] There is no statistical testing to compare sensibility and specificity difference between 18 F-FDG PET-CT and CT, but all results were in favor of 18 F-FDG PET-CT. A recent meta-analysis showed high specificity (89%) and sensitivity (82%) of 18 F-FDG PET-CT for staging or restaging (metastatic lesions) of bladder cancer. 26 However, few published series have assessed the value of 18 F-FDG PET-CT for the precise diagnosis of lymph node invasion.…”
Section: 5%mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnostic performances of 18 F-FDG PET-CT for lymph node staging and/or detection of distant metastases in bladder cancer are better than those of standard CT. [23][24][25] There is no statistical testing to compare sensibility and specificity difference between 18 F-FDG PET-CT and CT, but all results were in favor of 18 F-FDG PET-CT. A recent meta-analysis showed high specificity (89%) and sensitivity (82%) of 18 F-FDG PET-CT for staging or restaging (metastatic lesions) of bladder cancer. 26 However, few published series have assessed the value of 18 F-FDG PET-CT for the precise diagnosis of lymph node invasion.…”
Section: 5%mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last few years PET/CT with the tracers 18 F-FDG, 11 C-choline or 11 C-acetate has evolved as a new staging modality combining cross-sectional anatomical and functional imaging [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. Several studies described increased accuracy and high specificity rates especially in the detection of lymph nodes or distant metastases to bone and visceral organs with 18 F-FDG-based [13,16,17,19,20], 11 C-choline-based [14,24,37] or 11 C-acetate-based [24] PET/CT, which had an impact on further clinical management in a significant number of patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, positron emission tomography (PET) as functional imaging with tracers like 18 F-FDG, 11 C-choline or 11 C-acetate in combination with CT has been introduced [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. However, these studies present conflicting data as to whether these new imaging modalities are able to improve clinical staging in comparison to results of the ‘gold standard' histopathology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Karbon (C) kolin veya C-methionin gibi mesaneye ekskresyonu daha az olan diğer radyoizotoplar ile yapılan çalışmalarda primer tümör gösterilebilmekte ise de bu radyoizotopların tanıya ve evrelemeye katkısı gösterilememiştir (8,11,20). PET-BT ile yapılan çalışmalar göstermiştir ki mesane kanseri nodal evrelemesinde kontrastlı BT'ye göre üstünlüğünü, primer tümör tanısında ve lokal evrelemede gösterememektedir (21,22,23).…”
Section: Pozitron Emisyon Tomografi-bilgisayarlı Tomografiunclassified