2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00414-017-1745-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of four commercial quantitative real-time PCR kits with inhibited and degraded samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After increasing with longer time at 95°C, the DI of the samples treated at 120°C decreased, possibly due to the high level of degradation of both targets. DI assessment has been previously shown to be useful in providing evidence of degraded DNA [18,19]. However, as mentioned above, the DI values appear to theoretically follow a parabolic shape in a graphic, in accordance with another study that assessed small and large nuclear autosomal targets [20].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…After increasing with longer time at 95°C, the DI of the samples treated at 120°C decreased, possibly due to the high level of degradation of both targets. DI assessment has been previously shown to be useful in providing evidence of degraded DNA [18,19]. However, as mentioned above, the DI values appear to theoretically follow a parabolic shape in a graphic, in accordance with another study that assessed small and large nuclear autosomal targets [20].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This variant approach had been thoroughly validated for routine analysis in our laboratory. PCR inhibition (common at samples from weapon parts, especially from inside the barrel) as indicated by the PowerQuant® data analysis tool was noted, but disregarded for the evaluation of the autosomal DNA concentrations, as an effect on the quantification is only visible at high concentrations [ 19 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, several DNA quantification kits have included degradation indexes (DI). However, the size of the DNA fragments targeted as well as the calculation of DI differs between kits [34]. As DNA profiles represent the final outcome of forensic DNA analyses, we choose to use an Integrity Index (INTI) which is calculated from electropherograms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%