2006
DOI: 10.1136/vr.159.16.526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of four manual tick‐removal devices for dogs and cats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All six studies were nonrandomized controlled animal studies. Tick removal methods were tested on various animals: sheep, pigs, dogs, cats, laboratory rabbits, guinea pigs or hedgehogs and 2 unidentified hosts …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…All six studies were nonrandomized controlled animal studies. Tick removal methods were tested on various animals: sheep, pigs, dogs, cats, laboratory rabbits, guinea pigs or hedgehogs and 2 unidentified hosts …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the studies the following tick species were used: Rhipicephalus sanguineus , I. ricinus , Dermacentor reticulates , Ixodes hexagonus , Haemaphysalis concinna , Dermacentor variabilis , and Amblyomma americanum ticks …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SIR, — Further to Bradley Viner's letter ( VR , October 21, 2006, vol 159, p 572) concerning the research on tick removal (Zenner and others 2006), I strongly agree that killing the tick with, for example, fipronil and leaving it in situ results in the least damage to the host. I have been using this method for more than 15 years and have never had an animal return with skin lesions; however, I have treated many animals with abscesses or granulomata following attempted manual removal by owners or other parties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…SIR, — I read with interest the short communication that evaluated four manual tick-removal devices for dogs and cats (Zenner and others 2006). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%