2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0426.2002.00386.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of four methods of transmitter attachment on shortnose sturgeon, Acipenser brevirostrum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…salmon, except when spawning), and rolling behaviour was not observed in either case. Similar observations on shortnose sturgeon (Collins et al, 2002) have shown that these animals 'occasionally' scrape the substrate, causing eventual tag loss. Other research using similar tags and attachment methods (Broell and Taggart, 2015) on saithe (P. virens) did not show a similar behavioural reaction to tag load, but these animals are pelagic species and did not exhibit scouring as observed in cod.…”
Section: Validity Of Data In the Fieldsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…salmon, except when spawning), and rolling behaviour was not observed in either case. Similar observations on shortnose sturgeon (Collins et al, 2002) have shown that these animals 'occasionally' scrape the substrate, causing eventual tag loss. Other research using similar tags and attachment methods (Broell and Taggart, 2015) on saithe (P. virens) did not show a similar behavioural reaction to tag load, but these animals are pelagic species and did not exhibit scouring as observed in cod.…”
Section: Validity Of Data In the Fieldsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…While direct observations of tag loss and associated swimming behaviour are limited, shortnose sturgeon (Acipenser brevirostrum), rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and salema (Sarpa salpa) fitted with transmitters attached below the dorsal fin have been observed to scour vigorously against tank enclosures, leading to external tag loss and skin abrasions (Mellas and Haynes, 1985;Collins et al, 2002;Jadot, 2003). This distinctive and repeated scouringassociated rotational movement (flashing, scraping) in the vertical-lateral plane has also been observed in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) in order to dislodge parasites (Jeffrey Hutchings, Department of Biology, Dalhousie University, personal communication).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collins et al [29] used external radio tagging on shortnose (Acipenser brevirostrum) and Atlantic (A. oxyrinchus) sturgeons in a field study and found poor retention for both species. In a subsequent tank experiment, only one of 12 individuals retained the tag after 40 days [30]. They judged external tagging unsuitable for these species.…”
Section: Example Taxon Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, this individual displayed movement associated with rolling behaviour during the first 10 h of deployment (time series of roll angle, not presented here). This may relate to tag-removal behaviour similar to the scouring movement in Atlantic cod [60] and has also been observed in shortnose sturgeon in response to tag load [61]. This too suggests a considerable impact of tagging, handling and tag-load (>2 %) stresses and questions the health status and long-term survival of the individual.…”
Section: Post-release Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Since these events occur most frequently just post-release, they most likely relate to tagging stress or tag-load-removing behaviour (e.g. [60,61]), and given the high VeDBA, they considerably affect the total energy budget. High VeDBA during tag-load-related movements, indicated by high roll angles in the smallest individual, likely contributed to additional energy expenditure.…”
Section: Post-release Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%