2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2008.00290.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of four non‐invasive methods for examination and characterization of pressure ulcers

Abstract: We conclude that temperature and elasticity measurements do not alone characterize ulceration severity, although redness index in some cases provides a useful indication. We assume that a subepidermal layer found on ultrasound images may be a measure of the pressure that the skin has been subjected to, rather than of the severity of the pressure ulceration. This method may be useful for predicting whether the skin is at risk of developing pressure ulcers. More studies are needed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A hypoechogenic (appearing darker in HFUS images) subepidermal layer has been noted in HFUS images in conjunction with known skin tissue injury. [13][14][15] The hypoechogenic areas are thought to reflect increasing fluid content associated with inflammation indicating soft tissue edema before visible damage is noted at the skin surface. 8,10,[13][14][15][16][17][18] HFUS was validated as a sensitive method for changes in dermal hydration associated with edema formation by nuclear magnetic resonance imaging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A hypoechogenic (appearing darker in HFUS images) subepidermal layer has been noted in HFUS images in conjunction with known skin tissue injury. [13][14][15] The hypoechogenic areas are thought to reflect increasing fluid content associated with inflammation indicating soft tissue edema before visible damage is noted at the skin surface. 8,10,[13][14][15][16][17][18] HFUS was validated as a sensitive method for changes in dermal hydration associated with edema formation by nuclear magnetic resonance imaging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15] The hypoechogenic areas are thought to reflect increasing fluid content associated with inflammation indicating soft tissue edema before visible damage is noted at the skin surface. 8,10,[13][14][15][16][17][18] HFUS was validated as a sensitive method for changes in dermal hydration associated with edema formation by nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. 19 In the acute care setting, HFUS may be used for documentation, detection, and monitoring of soft tissue injury in patients at risk upon hospital or long-term care admission; however, little is known regarding its accuracy or reliability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Ref. 9, 15 pressure ulcers were examined using four different noninvasive techniques: Skin temperature, redness index, skin retraction time, and ultrasound ͑US͒ scanning. Results showed that temperature and retraction time could not alone characterize the ulceration stage, while a redness index was useful in some cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifi c ultrasound fi ndings indicative of underlying tissue damage included hypoechogenic layers or pockets consistent with edema formation, and loss of clear differentiation of the various skin layers. 12,19,20 Aoi and colleagues 12 used a 10-MHz ultrasonic scanner and identifi ed discontinuity of the fascia layer as an additional indicator of deep tissue damage. Deprez and colleagues 21 suggest that pressure ulcer development is characterized by stiffening of the involved tissue, and that this stiffening can be detected through anot her ultrasound measurement, tissue elastography.…”
Section: Summary Of Consensus Statements From the Incontinence-associmentioning
confidence: 99%