1979
DOI: 10.1093/jee/72.2.188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Four Stink Bug Species From Three Genera Affecting Soybean Yield and Quality in Louisiana13

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These data corroborate conclusions from Miner (1966) that E. servus was generally of negligible concern as a pest of soybean and that N. viridula and A. hilare caused most of the damage from pentatomids in southeast Arkansas. McPherson et al (1979) found that the fecundity of N. viridula was Ϸ2.6-fold that of E. servus. E. servus also had a preoviposition period ϳ2 wk longer than that of N. viridula (McPherson et al 1979).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These data corroborate conclusions from Miner (1966) that E. servus was generally of negligible concern as a pest of soybean and that N. viridula and A. hilare caused most of the damage from pentatomids in southeast Arkansas. McPherson et al (1979) found that the fecundity of N. viridula was Ϸ2.6-fold that of E. servus. E. servus also had a preoviposition period ϳ2 wk longer than that of N. viridula (McPherson et al 1979).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…McPherson et al (1979) found that the fecundity of N. viridula was Ϸ2.6-fold that of E. servus. E. servus also had a preoviposition period ϳ2 wk longer than that of N. viridula (McPherson et al 1979). These two characteristics likely account for densities of E. servus not building to the damaging levels observed with N. viridula and A. hilare.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other workers also reported greater damage as well as yield reduction after stink bug infestations during R3ÐR4 but not during R6 ÐR8 (Yeargan 1977) or R5ÐR7 (Thomas et al 1974). McPherson et al (1979) however observed that quality and yield were not affected by stink bug feeding during R5ÐR6. We found yield reduction after stink bug infestation during R3ÐR4 and R5.5 but saw no effect of infestation on weight per 100 seeds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…If soybeans are grown for seed, then a lower population (1.1 stink bugs per 2 m of row) justiÞes control. McPherson et al (1979) found signiÞcant yield reduction when soybean plants were exposed to southern green stink populations as low as 0.5 stink bugs per 0.3 m of row for 6 Ð7 wk, which demonstrates the adverse effect of subeconomic infestation levels over prolonged periods. This study, along with the earlier reports of Todd and Turnipseed (1974) and Yeargan (1977) that designated one stink bug per 0.3 m of row as intolerable, likely were instrumental in the establishment of many economic thresholds for stink bugs in the southern United States.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%