2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of fracture toughness master curve shifts for JMTR irradiated F82H using small specimens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At higher temperature, constraint loss dominates resulting in very high effective toughness. Such sharp transitions were already observed by Yamamoto et al [8] for specimens of similar size. Second, at temperature low enough all the specimens failed by cleavage below 100 MPa m 1/2 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At higher temperature, constraint loss dominates resulting in very high effective toughness. Such sharp transitions were already observed by Yamamoto et al [8] for specimens of similar size. Second, at temperature low enough all the specimens failed by cleavage below 100 MPa m 1/2 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…6. In order to calculate the coefficient C 0 , defined as DT 0 /Dr 0.2_RT [8], it was necessary to convert the irradiation hardening at 300°C (50 MPa) to the irradiation hardening at room temperature. A reasonable estimate of the irradiation hardening at T test = 20°C is 62 MPa.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While being attractive candidates, neutron irradiation at temperatures below 400-450°C results in significant shifts of the so-called ductile to brittle transition temperature [2][3][4][5][6][7]. In order to quantify this so-called embrittlement and other factors that control toughness in the transition region, Odette et al proposed a systematic and highly efficient approach based upon the mastercurve temperature shift method [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simple but reasonable approach is to consider a linear relation between T o and σ y . Such an analysis was done for the F82H-mod RAFM steel by Yamamoto et al [43] who found: T o = α σ y with α = 0.58. While some refinements have already been proposed to better take into account the overall effects of irradiation on the plastic flow by calculating an average flow stress increase instead of σ y [44], good predictions of embrittlement can be derived simply from the measure of the radiation hardening.…”
Section: Small Specimen Test Technology 231 Small Specimen Test Techn...mentioning
confidence: 99%