Evaluation of Freshwater Flow From Rivers to the Sea in CMIP5 Simulations: Insights From the Congo River Basin

Abstract

Despite the multisectoral importance of water resources in the context of climate change, it remains still difficult to correctly simulate the terrestrial water cycle via general circulation and Earth system models. While existing model evaluation efforts from the Climate Model Intercomparison Project 5 (CMIP5) are mainly focused on atmospheric variables, we considered here the simulated freshwater flux into the ocean for the river Congo by 20 CMIP5 models. We found that many advancements are still required in global modeling to satisfactorily reproduce the discharge, at least for Congo River. Only the distribution of intermonthly and interannual anomalies of simulated flow, calculated as percent deviations from the respective long‐term average, appears not significantly different from that found in observations. Conversely, most of the models appear to largely overestimate the streamflow seasonal cycle, up to 4–5 times for some months. Further, when looking at severer anomalies in terms of abnormal low‐flow periods (hydrological droughts), the models seem to underestimate their frequency and magnitude while overestimating the duration of deficit conditions with respect to hypothetical water demand. These overall discrepancies between models and observations could propagate in reproducing the land‐ocean feedbacks, as discharge is known to affect sea surface salinity and temperature and, thus, the regional to global ocean circulation and climate. Moreover, biased model‐based discharge simulations could wrongly support water management and infrastructure planning for large river basins, especially when using models instead of measurements, as in case of ungauged rivers, or however when clarification of models' uncertainty is missed.

Global characterization of hydrological and meteorological droughts under future climate change: The importance of timescales, vegetation‐CO2feedbacks and changes to distribution functions

“…This has been shown for metrics that employ precipitation data only (e.g., Standardized precipitation index [SPI]; Orlowsky and Seneviratne, 2013;Preethi et al, 2019), as well as metrics that combine precipitation and AED (e.g., PDSI; Zhao and Dai, 2017). The lack of CMIP5 model skill in reproduction near-present observations of hydrological drought has been shown in earlier works (e.g., Santini and Caporaso, 2018;Ukkola et al, 2018). However, other studies also confirmed the capabilities of CMIP5 models to capture the temporal variability and magnitude of observed soil moisture (e.g., Yuan and Quiring, 2017).…”

Improved representation of river runoff in Estimating the Circulation and Climate of the Ocean Version 4 (ECCOv4) simulations: implementation, evaluation, and impacts to coastal plume regions

“…The inlet approach, which defines a rectangular breach in coastal land cells with uniform density and discharge, is widely used (Herzfeld, 2015;Garvine, 2001). An additional barotropic pressure term may be added to account for pressure gradients induced by the freshwater plume (Schiller and Kourafalou, 2011). The inlet approach has also been used in global z-coordinate models by injecting freshwater in multiple vertical grid cells (Griffies et al, 2005).…”

Evaluation of South Atlantic Thermohaline Properties from BESM-OA2.5 and Three Additional Global Climate Models

“…Thus, as with the temperature biases, mesoscale processes are the possible error sources associated with coarse grid resolutions in salinity bias fields. Other sources of bias may be linked to the reproduction of the discharges of these rivers, arising from simulated precipitation by the continental process modules of the GCMs (Santini and Caporaso, 2018). Especially for GG, errors in the runoff of rivers or in precipitation values can be even more significant in SSS bias.…”