2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11740-010-0287-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of friction in upsetting

Abstract: Distributions of contact stresses at the neutral point in metal forming are very hard to be properly predicted due to the complex interface situation and lack of suitable friction models. In this paper, the dynamic friction model in which the friction depends on both time rate of strain and normal pressure has been applied to predict contact stresses in cylinder upsetting. Case studies have shown that the predicted results agreed with the experimental data chosen from literature. By comparing with two other fr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The provided graph is somewhat artificial as in reality the friction coefficient changes in the process of compression and differs along the lateral direction of contact area [8,18]. Nevertheless, the obtained results (see Figure 5) allow supposing weak influence of the friction coefficient on the value of the tool displacement (less than 8%).…”
Section: Discussing the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The provided graph is somewhat artificial as in reality the friction coefficient changes in the process of compression and differs along the lateral direction of contact area [8,18]. Nevertheless, the obtained results (see Figure 5) allow supposing weak influence of the friction coefficient on the value of the tool displacement (less than 8%).…”
Section: Discussing the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Deng [12] also proposed a new friction testing method, the T-shape upsetting-extruding process employing a rectangular blank, for evaluating the friction conditions during the rib-web part-forming process. Tan [13] proposed a dynamic friction model in which friction depends on both the time rate of strain and normal pressure to predict contact stresses in cylinder upsetting. In addition to these, many investigations have proceeded to explore other aspects [14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Friction between the platens and the workpiece during metal forming can be indirectly measured during the test to simulate industrial processes. Tan 16 proposed a dynamic friction model in which the friction depends on both strain rate and normal pressure and employed the model to predict contact stresses in disc-upsetting. The model, however, does not account for barrelling and assumes a cylindrical profile which limits its applicability to real tests and processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%