2017
DOI: 10.1177/0748233717733599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of gamma radiation-induced DNA damage in Aedes aegypti using the comet assay

Abstract: The study was undertaken to evaluate gamma radiation-induced DNA damage in Aedes aegypti. The comet assay was employed to demonstrate the extent of DNA damage produced in adult male A. aegypti exposed to seven different doses of gamma radiation, ranging from 1 Gy to 50 Gy. DNA damage was measured as the percentage of comet tail DNA. A significant linear increase in DNA damage was observed in all samples; the extent of damage being proportional to the dose of gamma radiation the organism received, except in tho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reduced longevity following exposure to high doses of radiation have been reported previously in Ae . aegypti [47, 48] and Ae . albopictus [49, 50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reduced longevity following exposure to high doses of radiation have been reported previously in Ae . aegypti [47, 48] and Ae . albopictus [49, 50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shetty et al . 62 evaluated the gamma radiation induced DNA damage in Aedes aegypti using comet assay. All these studies used insect as a model to check toxicity of pollutants and other toxic chemicals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For some samples we had to combine results from two different dates to have enough nuclei for statistical analysis (Table S6). We dissected testes from approximately 8 flies from each treatment within one hour of radiation treatment to minimize the opportunity for breakage repair (Shetty et al . 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%