2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2015.08.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of General Nutrition Knowledge in Australian Military Personnel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
20
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…; Kullen et al . ). The internal reliability of the questionnaire items (Cronbach's alpha = 0.92) and test–retest reliability ( r = 0.87) were high (Hendrie et al .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…; Kullen et al . ). The internal reliability of the questionnaire items (Cronbach's alpha = 0.92) and test–retest reliability ( r = 0.87) were high (Hendrie et al .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For similar reasons, those adults living in a family situation and likely more exposed to fresh food preparation are reported to have higher levels of nutrition knowledge than those living alone (Kullen et al . ). Finally, there is evidence that nutrition knowledge is negatively associated with BMI and socio‐economic status (Kullen et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding is among the few studies to have used valid, reliable tools to assess both nutrition knowledge and dietary intake . Due to development of the “General Nutrition Knowledge Questionnaire” (GNKQ) a psychometrically valid and reliable instrument (Cronbach's alpha 0.97, test–retest reliability 0.98) nutrition knowledge has been measured in selected populations . Results from studies, using the GNKQ across several countries have identified that knowledge does vary between individuals, tending to be lower among those who are younger, male and/or of lower educational attainment .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eating is not only determined by physiology, but also by many other factors that interact in a complex way to shape individual eating habits (World Health Organization 2018a). People's food choices are influenced by determinants of varied nature, such as sociodemographic factors, biology, health, emotions, society and culture, convenience, price, ethical concerns, environmental aspects, political contexts, studies or nutrition knowledge, to cite the most relevant (Kullen et al 2016;Cunha et al 2018). In sum, foodrelated decisions depend on the person's cultural traditions, socioeconomic status, beliefs and values, marketing influences, as well as psychological and physiological factors (Rozin 2007;Köster 2009;Sobal & Bisogni 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%