2015
DOI: 10.4238/2015.november.30.19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of genetic divergence among clones of conilon coffee after scheduled cycle pruning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum and minimum dissimilarity values for each one of the 30 C. canephora genotypes, obtained based on the generalized Mahalanobis (D 2 ) distance, showed varied magnitude, with values ranging between 5.003 and 256.433, indicating broad genetic diversity in the studied population (Table III). Dalcomo et al (2015) evaluated 22 genotypes of conilon coffee from the breeding program of Incaper and also found elevated magnitude for genetic dissimilarity, with values between 7.32 and 168.37.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The maximum and minimum dissimilarity values for each one of the 30 C. canephora genotypes, obtained based on the generalized Mahalanobis (D 2 ) distance, showed varied magnitude, with values ranging between 5.003 and 256.433, indicating broad genetic diversity in the studied population (Table III). Dalcomo et al (2015) evaluated 22 genotypes of conilon coffee from the breeding program of Incaper and also found elevated magnitude for genetic dissimilarity, with values between 7.32 and 168.37.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on the genetic diversity of coffee adopting multivariate analyses have been carried out by many researchers, both for C. canephora (Fonseca et al 2006, Ivoglo et al 2008, Dalcomo et al 2015, Silva et al 2015, Covre et al 2016), and C. arabica (Dias et al 2005, Guedes et al 2013, Moura et al 2015, Rodrigues et al 2016. Information in this regard provides bases to be used in breeding programs for the species.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intraspecific variation also has been reported in diploid Coffea species from Africa (Noirot et al, 2002), as well as from islands in the Indian Ocean (Razafinarivo et al, 2013). Also, divergence and genetic diversity has been found in different C. canephora genotypes (Dalcomo et al, 2015;Giles et al, 2018) It is known that variations in genome size is mainly affected by retrotransposons, structural rearrangements, deletions at the individual chromosomal level, and illegitimate recombination (Bennetzen et al, 2005;Grover and Wendel, 2010;Williams et al, 2002). Mechanisms underlying intraspecific and interspecific genome size variation in plants, particularly at the evolutionary level are not well understood; thus, more research is required in this regard.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in morpho-physiology and productivity between Conilon coffee clones indicate the existence of genetic variability (Fonseca et al, 2006, Dalcomo et al, 2015 in the production phase, in the fruit maturation time, as well as in leaf patterns (Gomes et al, 2016) and in nutrient absorption and allocation across materials (Partelli et al, 2014b;Marré et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%