2014
DOI: 10.4314/sajas.v44i1.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of genetic trends for traits of economic importance in South African Holstein cattle

Abstract: Genetic evaluation for the South African dairy industry has kept pace with global advances in statistical methodology. Increasingly accurate estimated breeding values (EBVs), produced routinely in the past two or three decades, have aided selection decisions. This has been coupled with an increase in the number of traits officially recorded and for which EBVs are calculated. Currently, EBVs are routinely published for more than 20 traits for the major dairy breeds. The current study was conducted to assess the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current range of BVs for CI was shorter than the ranges from -8.14 to 11.91, -5.72 to 10.60 and -5.92 to 10.6 days obtained by Ayied et al (2011), El-Awady et al (2017 and Abdel-Hamid et al (2017), respectively. However, the slight positive improvement in GT was close to the values of 0.03, 0.06, 1.34 and 0.82 d/yr, as reported by Abdelharith (2008), Ibrahim et al (2009), Ramatsoma et al (2014) and Zahed et al (2019), respectively.…”
Section: Genetic Trend Of Calving Intervalsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The current range of BVs for CI was shorter than the ranges from -8.14 to 11.91, -5.72 to 10.60 and -5.92 to 10.6 days obtained by Ayied et al (2011), El-Awady et al (2017 and Abdel-Hamid et al (2017), respectively. However, the slight positive improvement in GT was close to the values of 0.03, 0.06, 1.34 and 0.82 d/yr, as reported by Abdelharith (2008), Ibrahim et al (2009), Ramatsoma et al (2014) and Zahed et al (2019), respectively.…”
Section: Genetic Trend Of Calving Intervalsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Katok and Yanar [ 55 ] reported that estimated annual genetic and phenotypic trends were 3.73 ± 4.07 and −17.73 ± 9.64 kg for 305-d milk yield of Holstein Frisian cows in Turkey but Hallowell et al [ 59 ] and Osman et al [ 60 ] found a positive trend in EBV 19 and 18.97 kg/year for the first lactation milk yield in South African Ayrshire and Holstein cattle, respectively. In another study Ramatsoma et al [ 61 ] reported a quadratic regression line for describing the genetic trend in milk yield over a specific period. The lower genetic trend for 305-d milk yield in our study may be due to smaller estimation of 305-d milk yield heritability.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CI has increased over time, resulting in longer calving interval (Wall et al, 2003). The genetic trend in CI was increased by 1.34 d/yr (Ramatsoma et al, 2014). In contrary, Atil and Khattab (2005) estimated genetic trend for CI to be -0.95 d/yr.…”
Section: Genetic and Phenotypic Trendmentioning
confidence: 99%