2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2013.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of GeneXpert MTB/RIF for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and resistance to rifampin in clinical specimens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
23
1
25

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
6
23
1
25
Order By: Relevance
“…Every effort should be made to make a confirmatory microbiological diagnosis but this is often not possible. New technologies such as Genexpert (Cepheid, California, USA) can expedite diagnosis while providing early information on rifampicin sensitivity 161. Anti‐TB treatment should always be started at TB diagnosis.…”
Section: Coinfectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Every effort should be made to make a confirmatory microbiological diagnosis but this is often not possible. New technologies such as Genexpert (Cepheid, California, USA) can expedite diagnosis while providing early information on rifampicin sensitivity 161. Anti‐TB treatment should always be started at TB diagnosis.…”
Section: Coinfectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) was introduced as a semiautomated and semiquantitative nested real-time PCR (RT-PCR) assay for the simultaneous detection of M. tuberculosis and resistance to rifampin (RIF) directly from clinical specimens (6,7). Given its excellent performance in several clinical studies and easy handling (7)(8)(9), the GeneXpert assay received a strong endorsement from the World Health Organization (WHO) (1). However, there are some issues related to increased use of the GeneXpert assay in high-and low-income countries, including the cost, the inability to detect nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), and problems associated with the detection of rifampin-resistant strains (10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 Bunsow E et al support the accuracy and rapidity of the test, but suggest other confirmatory tests for drug resistant mycobacteria. 32 Centre for disease control too recommends combination of tests, in particular for smear negative cases. 33 This technique is not free from drawbacks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%