2019
DOI: 10.5455/faa.301258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of groundwater quality for irrigation and drinking purposes in Barishal district of Bangladesh

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 3 and Figure 8a show the categorization of collected groundwater wells according to salinity levels. TDS values indicated that about 20% of the groundwater wells have salinity levels less than 700 mg/L, which ensures no restriction for irrigation; approximately 56% have salinity levels ranging from 700 to 3000 mg/L, which mandates slight to moderate restriction for agriculture; and the remaining 24% have a salinity level of more than 3000 mg/L, making it unsuitable and highly restrictive for irrigation [71][72][73], as presented in Table 3. Figure 8a showed the spatial distribution of groundwater quality for agriculture with respect to salinity hazard in the investigated area.…”
Section: Total Dissolved Solids (Tds)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 3 and Figure 8a show the categorization of collected groundwater wells according to salinity levels. TDS values indicated that about 20% of the groundwater wells have salinity levels less than 700 mg/L, which ensures no restriction for irrigation; approximately 56% have salinity levels ranging from 700 to 3000 mg/L, which mandates slight to moderate restriction for agriculture; and the remaining 24% have a salinity level of more than 3000 mg/L, making it unsuitable and highly restrictive for irrigation [71][72][73], as presented in Table 3. Figure 8a showed the spatial distribution of groundwater quality for agriculture with respect to salinity hazard in the investigated area.…”
Section: Total Dissolved Solids (Tds)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both PH and electrical conductivity (EC 25 ) were measured, calcium and magnesium ions (Ca +2 , Mg +2 ), sodium and potassium (Na + , K + ), carbonates and bicarbonates (CO 3 -2 , HCO 3 -), sulphates (SO 4 ) and chlorides (Cl -) were estimated. As well, the sodium percentage (Na%), sodium adsorption ratio (SAR), magnesium adsorption ratio (MAR), residual sodium carbonate (RSC), potential salinity (PS), permeability index (PI) and the Kelly ratio (KR) were calculated [17][18][19]. In addition to the assessment of the studied groundwater quality for irrigation purposes based on international classifications for each of the following characteristics: EC 25 , SAR, SSP, RSC, MAR, PS, KR [20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, weight was given to 5 for electrical conductivity and Potential salinity due to its effect on soil and plants. In contrast, potassium was given a weight of 1 for its low concentration in river water in all studied sites compared to the global determinants approved for Irrigation (Yasmin et al, 2019) shown in table (2), The irrigation water quality index (IWQI) is also calculated from the following five stages. Where: Wi: relative weight., wi: property weight., Qi: quality rating., Ci: the value of the measured characteristic, Si: the standard concentration of the characteristic, according to international classifications.…”
Section: Description Of the Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%