2009
DOI: 10.21273/hortsci.19.2.411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Growth, Flowering, and Cold Hardiness of Ceanothus in Western Oregon

Abstract: Thirty-eight species, cultivars, and hybrid selections of ceanothus (Ceanothus spp.) were evaluated for growth, flowering, and cold hardiness in a landscape trial in Silverton, OR, from 2001 to 2005. Plants were only irrigated for establishment in Summer 2001 and were not pruned or fertilized throughout the trial. Several cultivars showed dieback and leaf damage after 22 °F cold events in late October and early Nov. 2002 and 2003, the most severely affected of which were Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Injury to specific cultivars varied between the two cold spells evaluated in this study; in some cases, they varied considerably. This was seen to some extent in previous landscape studies of woody plants (Bell, 2009;Bell and Altland 2010). Although there is considerable literature about the variations in the cold hardiness of woody plants between seasons within a given year, no work has addressed the causes of variation in hardiness of individual plants between growing seasons.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Injury to specific cultivars varied between the two cold spells evaluated in this study; in some cases, they varied considerably. This was seen to some extent in previous landscape studies of woody plants (Bell, 2009;Bell and Altland 2010). Although there is considerable literature about the variations in the cold hardiness of woody plants between seasons within a given year, no work has addressed the causes of variation in hardiness of individual plants between growing seasons.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%