1992
DOI: 10.1109/8.142635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Hankel functions with complex argument and complex order

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the deep lit side, it is observed that the Pekeris function P m ,e{í', T) is defined as in (37a), and is well behaved for £' <C 0; but for the coupled Pekeris integral P C *(£',T) the function in (37b) does not work properly in the deep lit region, because the main contributions there come from the saddle point v s = A; i0 6sin/3, which is far from the transition region, where the Watson's representation of Hankel functions [24] fail. On the other hand, Olver's asymptotic formulas [24] are used here for the Hankel functions in the coefficient A c n in (14b). Moreover, the large argument asymptotic approximation for the Hankel functions [19] when used in (20) also fails, and, therefore, Debye's formulas [25] are applied instead.…”
Section: Lit Part Of Transition Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the deep lit side, it is observed that the Pekeris function P m ,e{í', T) is defined as in (37a), and is well behaved for £' <C 0; but for the coupled Pekeris integral P C *(£',T) the function in (37b) does not work properly in the deep lit region, because the main contributions there come from the saddle point v s = A; i0 6sin/3, which is far from the transition region, where the Watson's representation of Hankel functions [24] fail. On the other hand, Olver's asymptotic formulas [24] are used here for the Hankel functions in the coefficient A c n in (14b). Moreover, the large argument asymptotic approximation for the Hankel functions [19] when used in (20) also fails, and, therefore, Debye's formulas [25] are applied instead.…”
Section: Lit Part Of Transition Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expansion for H (2) λ (λz) can be obtained by changing the sign of i in (A-2). Here, we use the first two terms to obtain more accurate numerical results, which is different from [9] employing only the leading term. In (A-2), the important parameter ξ should be treated carefully and the branch is chosen so that ξ is real when z is positive, i.e.,…”
Section: The Asymptotic Expansion Of the Airy Function Ismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kim [7], and Shim and Kim [8] used the Watson transformation to analyze the scattering of a coated sphere. Paknys [9], and Paknys and Jackson [10] studied a variety of asymptotic expansions of Hankel functions and used the Watson transformation to explain the behaviors of complex waves. Li and Chew [11] gave a new residue series solution of Watson transformation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By applying Olver's uniform representation for Bessel and Hankel functions of complex order [12], the sought poles ] for the two analyzed cases are found by plotting the denominators of (5) as functions of complex variable and searching for their zeros. The calculated loci of poles in complex ]-plane are illustrated in Figure 2, while the exact values of the poles with smallest imaginary part (i.e., the propagation coefficients of the dominant creeping waves) are summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Application To Human Body Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%