2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2020.104277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of haplotype callers for next-generation sequencing of viruses

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be impacted by the quality of the HTS sequences produced, by read length, but also by the algorithms used for quality control, contig assembly, and SNP identification. The statistical approach selected for the haplotyping analysis is another key factor to consider; its performance is determined by mutation rate and was demonstrated to decrease with genetic diversity of the sample (see McCrone and Lauring, 2016;Posada-Cespedes and Seifert, 2017;Eliseev et al, 2020).…”
Section: Single-nucleotide Polymorphisms (Snps) and Virus Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be impacted by the quality of the HTS sequences produced, by read length, but also by the algorithms used for quality control, contig assembly, and SNP identification. The statistical approach selected for the haplotyping analysis is another key factor to consider; its performance is determined by mutation rate and was demonstrated to decrease with genetic diversity of the sample (see McCrone and Lauring, 2016;Posada-Cespedes and Seifert, 2017;Eliseev et al, 2020).…”
Section: Single-nucleotide Polymorphisms (Snps) and Virus Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like HAPHPIPE, but unlike viral-ngs and MiCall, V-pipe calls haplotypes. Rather than using PredictHaplo, V-pipe implements HaploClique and Savage for global haplotype reconstruction and ShoRAH for local reconstruction, all of which performed poorly relative to PredictHaplo in a recent comparison of haplotype reconstruction tools [ 65 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purposes of this study, we focus on the composition of the consensus sequences, but additionally report haplotype data for the HIV and HCV empirical datasets as validation of HAPHPIPE’s intra-host analytical capabilities. See Eliseev et al [ 65 ] for an evaluation of haplotype reconstruction tools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the length of individual sequences has little effect on the identification of HIV DRMs, short NGS read lengths and high genetic diversity makes it difficult to analyze HIV quasispecies at the haplotype or variant level using existing haplotype callers [ 56 ].…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While HIV pol gene sequencing largely serves the needs for HIVDR genotyping, such sequencing data is often also applied in molecular epidemiology, such as cluster analysis. Thus far, NGS-based cluster analyses are largely based upon (1) NGS consensus sequences that simply mimic SS sequences; (2) reconstructed viral variants using quasispecies reconstruction tools that often perform poorly on HIV NGS data [ 56 , 57 ].…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%