2018
DOI: 10.1080/0886022x.2018.1427110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of health-related quality of life in hemolytic uraemic syndrome patients treated with eculizumab: a systematic evaluation on basis of EMPRO

Abstract: Background: Hemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS) is progressive renal failure disease and determination of their quality of life (QoL) on the basis of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are becoming increasingly important in the economic evaluations for its treatment with eculizumab (ECU).Aim: To perform the systematic evaluation of QoL in HUS patients treated with ECU on the basis of Evaluating Measures of Patient Reported Outcomes (EMPRO) tool.Materials and methods: A systematic review was conducted in PubMed, EMB… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, eculizumab is approved only as an interval medication for secondary prevention of sudden exacerbations of NMOSD symptoms. Nonetheless, eculizumab is being used off‐label in patients with NMOSD suffering from severe symptom exacerbations, while PEX provides little to no benefit, as well as during acute episodes of hemolytic‐uremic syndrome and additional diseases linked to acute complement factor 5 (C5) activation 33 . Therefore, if further research is performed, our selected proteins could serve as significant biomarkers in personalized treatment plans to optimize therapeutic effectiveness and minimize the risks and costs associated with side effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, eculizumab is approved only as an interval medication for secondary prevention of sudden exacerbations of NMOSD symptoms. Nonetheless, eculizumab is being used off‐label in patients with NMOSD suffering from severe symptom exacerbations, while PEX provides little to no benefit, as well as during acute episodes of hemolytic‐uremic syndrome and additional diseases linked to acute complement factor 5 (C5) activation 33 . Therefore, if further research is performed, our selected proteins could serve as significant biomarkers in personalized treatment plans to optimize therapeutic effectiveness and minimize the risks and costs associated with side effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This analysis of data from the Global aHUS Registry represents the first evaluation of fatigue and other patient-reported outcomes directly from patients enrolled in the registry, including general health status, health care resource utilization, work status, and symptoms, and provides important insights into the burden of aHUS. Previous descriptions of health-related quality of life in patients with aHUS have focused on the effect of eculizumab on health-related quality of life, 21 whereas this analysis provides insights into the overall burden and quality of life in patients with aHUS, regardless of treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FACIT-F scale was originally designed to assess the fatigue among cancer patients, showing good internal consistency reliability and discriminant and convergent validity� 49 The FACIT-F instrument has been evaluated in rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis, primary Sjogren's syndrome, osteoarthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, chronic immune thrombocytopenia, Parkinson disease, and systemic lupus erythematosus, as well as many other long-term conditions (e.g., multiple sclerosis, cancer, neurologic disorders)� 48,50,51,[60][61][62][63][64] In a systematic evaluation of quality of life in patients with aHUS treated with eculizumab based on the Evaluating Measures of Patient-Reported Outcomes tool, the psychometric determinants properties of FACIT-F instrument were assessed and rated� This rating was done on the basis on 3 studies where this instrument had been used among patients with aHUS to determine their HRQoL� 10,65,66 Scores generated by the tool were considered reasonably acceptable when they exceeded ≥ 50 points, and the maximum theoretical points were 100. Based on this scale, the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of FACIT-F instrument achieved 25.00, 54.17, and 55.56, respectively, showing a low score for reliability and slightly above the overall threshold of acceptable validity and responsiveness� 52…”
Section: Facit-f Scalementioning
confidence: 92%