2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of hearing and auditory nerve function by combining ABR, DPOAE and eABR tests into a single recording session

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recordings were made at intensity levels of 45, 55, 65 and 75 dB SPL. These settings were based both on our own trials and on previous studies (Polak 2004) to obtain the largest DPOAE responses. The DPOAE response generated at 2F1-F2 was used in analyses by plotting the amplitude of the response against the F1/F2 stimulus frequency.…”
Section: Otoacoustic Emission Recordingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recordings were made at intensity levels of 45, 55, 65 and 75 dB SPL. These settings were based both on our own trials and on previous studies (Polak 2004) to obtain the largest DPOAE responses. The DPOAE response generated at 2F1-F2 was used in analyses by plotting the amplitude of the response against the F1/F2 stimulus frequency.…”
Section: Otoacoustic Emission Recordingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrode coupling was monopolar with the reference electrode according to the Pulsar/Sonata stimulator. The stimulation technique was adapted from Polak et al (2004) and included the following: (1) recording electrodes were placed on the forehead (+) and mastoid (À) with the mastoid electrode on the same side as the implant; (2) the ground electrode was positioned on the central forehead; (3) stimulation with alternating polarity; (4) averaged recordings derived by equal numbers (n = 1000) of cathodic/anodic pulses were collected. Recording results were displayed with the centered line as the average, and the surrounding lines corresponding to each leading polarity (see, for example, Fig.…”
Section: Stimulation and Recording Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hearing of both ears of all guinea pigs was measured by ABR responses to pure-tone stimuli (0.5Y16 kHz) at presurgery and on post-EIT on Days 0, 3, 5, 7, 14, and 30 as previously described (15). Intelligent Hearing Systems (IHS, Miami, FL, USA) hardware and software were used to record ABR responses to pure-tone stimuli of 0.5, 1, 4, and 16 kHz.…”
Section: Abr Recordingmentioning
confidence: 99%