2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-06755-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of hearing preservation in adults with a slim perimodiolar electrode

Abstract: Purpose Numerous endeavors have been undertaken to preserve hearing in cochlear implant (CI) patients. Particularly, optimization of electrode array design aims at preservation of residual hearing (RH). This study examines whether a slim perimodiolar (PM) electrode array could bear the capability to preserve hearing. Methods A total of 47 patients underwent cochlear implantation receiving the PM electrode. (i) Patients with pure tone audiogram (PTA) thresh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…HP was better with the SlimJ compared with the Mid-Scala array. This aligns with previous studies showing better HP for LW than PM electrodes (23,43,44). Although HP may be better with LW arrays, it is still often possible to preserve hearing with precurves designs (45,46).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…HP was better with the SlimJ compared with the Mid-Scala array. This aligns with previous studies showing better HP for LW than PM electrodes (23,43,44). Although HP may be better with LW arrays, it is still often possible to preserve hearing with precurves designs (45,46).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Here, the best HP results were for SlimJ recipients whose preoperative hearing fell within EAS candidacy. This relationship between preoperative hearing and HP has previously been reported (44,48). However, not all studies have supported this correlation (49).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Loss of residual hearing after CI is still a clinically relevant problem in modern cochlear implant surgery, especially in patients who are suitable for electric acoustic stimulation ( Ludwig et al, 2021 ; Tarabichi et al, 2021 ). In concordance with these established clinical findings, the experimental data of the present study showed significant and progressive hearing loss 1 h and 2 h after CI electrode array insertion compared to sham.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The functional replacement of the organ of Corti with a cochlear implant (CI) not only improves the hearing ability itself but reduces social isolation among these patients significantly ( Singh et al, 2015 ; Davis et al, 2016 ). Particularly in patients undergoing cochlear implantation with functional residual hearing, the preservation of it is of utmost importance not only for electric-acoustic stimulation but also for optimal outcomes in patients with relevant hearing remnants ( Ludwig et al, 2021 ; Tarabichi et al, 2021 ). Residual hearing preservation in cochlear implantation relies on two principles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even in circumstances of profound postoperative acoustic hearing, patients perform much better post-CI than pre-CI, and rate their satisfaction with their CI the same. 21 The new FDA indications for these partial length arrays opened a new window of opportunity to patients living with partial hearing loss. Concurrent with the refinement of the Hybrid, each of the CI manufacturers on the U.S. market developed less traumatic electrode arrays that could potentially spare LF residual hearing and allow for EAS: the Cochlear Nucleus 622, 632, the MED-EL FLEXþ 28, and the Advanced Bionics (Valencia, CA) HiFocus MidScala and Slim J.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%