-Using both a Li-Cor Plant Canopy Analyzer (PCA) and the hemispherical photographs technique, we measured the gap fraction in two young beech pole stands of known leaf tip angle distribution. The average contact number at various zenith angles (K(&thetas;) function) was determined and leaf area index was calculated using the method proposed previously. The following cases were examined: 1) data from PCA using five, four or three rings, 2) data from hemispherical photographs, arranged in rings, and divided into azimuth sectors (90, 45 and 22.5°) or averaged over azimuth (360°). These results were compared with a semi-direct estimation of the leaf area index derived from allometric relationships established at tree level. We also compared the G(&thetas;) functions calculated using direct measurements of the leaf tip angle distribution with those deduced from transmittance data. The two indirect techniques gave the same estimation of the gap fraction at all zenith angles. When data were processed using the random model (averaged over azimuth), the PCA and photographs provided the same values of leaf area index, these values being considerably lower than those from allometric relationships (-25 %). When data from hemispherical photographs were divided into narrow azimuth sectors (22.5°), assuming a quasi-random model, the estimate of leaf area index was improved, but remained about 10 % below the allometric estimates. Leaf area index estimated using the random model was found to be 75 % of that estimated using allometric relationships. It is shown that the underestimation of the leaf area index observed considering all five rings on the PCA is due to an inappropriate use of the random model. It is also shown that the increase in leaf area index that was observed when neglecting one or two rings (PCA)