Evaluation of high‐resolution sea ice models on the basis of statistical and scaling properties of Arctic sea ice drift and deformation

Abstract

[1] Sea ice drift and deformation from models are evaluated on the basis of statistical and scaling properties. These properties are derived from two observation data sets: the RADARSAT Geophysical Processor System (RGPS) and buoy trajectories from the International Arctic Buoy Program (IABP). Two simulations obtained with the Louvain-la-Neuve Ice Model (LIM) coupled to a high-resolution ocean model and a simulation obtained with the Los Alamos Sea Ice Model (CICE) were analyzed. Model ice drift compares well with observations in terms of large-scale velocity field and distributions of velocity fluctuations although a significant bias on the mean ice speed is noted. On the other hand, the statistical properties of ice deformation are not well simulated by the models: (1) The distributions of strain rates are incorrect: RGPS distributions of strain rates are power law tailed, i.e., exhibit ''wild randomness,'' whereas models distributions remain in the Gaussian attraction basin, i.e., exhibit ''mild randomness.'' (2) The models are unable to reproduce the spatial and temporal correlations of the deformation fields: In the observations, ice deformation follows spatial and temporal scaling laws that express the heterogeneity and the intermittency of deformation. These relations do not appear in simulated ice deformation. Mean deformation in models is almost scale independent. The statistical properties of ice deformation are a signature of the ice mechanical behavior. The present work therefore suggests that the mechanical framework currently used by models is inappropriate. A different modeling framework based on elastic interactions could improve the representation of the statistical and scaling properties of ice deformation.Citation: Girard, L., J. Weiss, J. M. Molines, B. Barnier, and S. Bouillon (2009), Evaluation of high-resolution sea ice models on the basis of statistical and scaling properties of Arctic sea ice drift and deformation,

TOPAZ4: an ocean-sea ice data assimilation system for the North Atlantic and Arctic

“…The comparison of the ice drift from TOPAZ with that from IABP buoys and the Tara expedition (not shown) 650 P. Sakov et al: TOPAZ4 system reveals that the model ice drift is generally slightly too fast, by 3 km day −1 for slow drift as much as for fast drift, which is a known deficiency of the EVP type of model: Girard et al (2009) reported an even larger bias of 6 to 7 km day −1 . The too fast ice drift is advecting too much ice into the Beaufort Sea and is consistent with the ice pack being spread out, as mentioned above.…”

neXtSIM: a new Lagrangian sea ice model

“…One of the reasons to redesign or replace the VP and EVP rheologies is that classical models give a poor representation of ice drift and deformation statistics and scaling, compared with satellite observations (Girard et al, 2009). Girard et al (2011) introduced the elasto-brittle rheology and showed that this has the potential to accurately reproduce the aforementioned statistics and scaling.…”

A Nine-Year Climatology of Arctic Sea Ice Lead Orientation and Frequency from AMSR-E

“…A local structure tensor in a sea ice model as a measure of the sub-continuum anisotropy (such as leads) of the sea ice cover results in substantially changed sea ice thickness and drift in comparison to a reference run [10]. Girard et al [11] conclude that the poor representation of observed sea ice deformation patterns that represent lead structures in two high-resolution sea ice models could mainly be addressed to the used mechanical framework. The build-up of leads and the consequent anisotropy of the sea ice deformation can be captured within an elasto-brittle or an elastic-decohesive framework [12][13][14][15].…”