2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2009.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of histological scoring systems for tissue-engineered, repaired and osteoarthritic cartilage

Abstract: A great variety of histological scoring systems exists for analysis of osteoarthritic or normal, in vivo repaired or tissue-engineered cartilage, but only few have been validated. Use of these validated scores may considerably improve exchange of information necessary for advances in the field of cartilage regeneration.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
185
0
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 206 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
3
185
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Fourth, samples were analyzed according to the guidelines for cartilage assessment in animal studies [16]. For cartilage assessment, the modified O'Driscoll score was used [28] because it is validated in animal models [26,37]. Supporting the modified O'Driscoll score, two semiautomatic quantitative techniques were used as an internal reference: lCT and digital Safranin-O analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourth, samples were analyzed according to the guidelines for cartilage assessment in animal studies [16]. For cartilage assessment, the modified O'Driscoll score was used [28] because it is validated in animal models [26,37]. Supporting the modified O'Driscoll score, two semiautomatic quantitative techniques were used as an internal reference: lCT and digital Safranin-O analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, the reference standards we used, Mankin and Vaudey scores, have their own limitations. For the histopathologic assessment, we chose the Mankin score because it is the most widely used system (18,20). It mainly is used to detect changes in morphologic and histochemical characteristics, and cartilage volume and bone …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PLM images were recorded and saved. Each ROI that had been given a histopathology Mankin score was qualitatively assessed by using the grading scale (grade 0-4) published by Vaudey to describe the birefringence characteristics of the articular cartilage matrix (19,20). Details of this scoring system are shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Mr Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The histological slides were evaluated by scale according to the criteria established by Mankin et al (1971). Thus, the partial score of each compartment was obtained by calculating the evaluation system standardized by the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) and established by Bao et al 2009 andRutgers et al 2010 where score= grade x stage, grade (scale, 0-6) was defined as OA depth progression into cartilage irrespective of its horizontal extent; stage (scale, 0-4) was defined as the horizontal extent of cartilage involvement within one side of a joint compartment irrespective of the underlying grade; score (scale, 0-24) was defined as assessment of combined OA grade and OA stage. Thus the partial score ranged from 0 to 24 in each compartment, and the total joint score was obtained by summing the partial scores.…”
Section: Histopathologic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%