2005
DOI: 10.1115/1.1924463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Horizontal Well Performance After Drilling-Induced Formation Damage

Abstract: It is well recognized that near-wellbore formation damage can dramatically reduce well productivities, especially for open hole completed horizontal wells. The economic impact of poor productivity of these wells has pushed toward significant efforts in recent years to study laboratory testing techniques and numerical modeling methods for predicting and controlling drilling-induced formation damage. This paper presents an integrated approach, combining a near-wellbore modeling with laboratory experiments for da… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To simulate drilling induced formation damage, the near-wellbore physics, such as the presence of mud cake, phase trapping, polymer adsorption/retention, wettability alteration, high fluid viscosity, etc., should be considered (Ding and Renard, 2005;Wu et al, 2009). All these phenomena are taken into account by the near-well model, but cannot be considered by the standard reservoir simulator.…”
Section: Example 2 Simulation Of Drilling Induced Formation Damagementioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To simulate drilling induced formation damage, the near-wellbore physics, such as the presence of mud cake, phase trapping, polymer adsorption/retention, wettability alteration, high fluid viscosity, etc., should be considered (Ding and Renard, 2005;Wu et al, 2009). All these phenomena are taken into account by the near-well model, but cannot be considered by the standard reservoir simulator.…”
Section: Example 2 Simulation Of Drilling Induced Formation Damagementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Modelling of near-well flow requires very fine gridblocks around the well, which is not at the same scale as the reservoir flow simulation. Some models have been developed to study the near-wellbore formation damage mechanism and the stimulation procedure (see, for example, Minssieux et al, 1998;Veerapen et al, 2001;Ding et al, 2004;Parn-anurak and Engler, 2004;Ding and Renard, 2005;Bedrikovetsky et al, 2006;Moghadasi et al, 2006;Civan, 2007;Cohen et al, 2008;Byrne et al, 2009;Lohne et al, 2009;Wu et al, 2009), but most of them are standalone for the modelling around a single well and are decoupled from reservoir and production scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, an equivalent skin or numerical PI value used for long-term production simulation can be determined through an inversion procedure (see, Ding and Renard 2005).…”
Section: Determination Of Skins Through Inversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional aspects, such as high viscosity of drilling fluid, different relative permeability curves between drilling fluid and reservoir fluid, different cake properties during drilling and back production etc., should be considered (Ding et al [3], [4]). Additional aspects, such as high viscosity of drilling fluid, different relative permeability curves between drilling fluid and reservoir fluid, different cake properties during drilling and back production etc., should be considered (Ding et al [3], [4]).…”
Section: Near-well Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some models have been developed to study the near-wellbore formation damage (Minssieux et al [1], Veerapen et al [2], Ding et al [3][4], Bedrikovetsky et al [5], Moghadasi et al [6], Civan [7]), but these models are mostly used for the modeling of formation damage around a single well and are decoupled from reservoir production scenarios. The economic impact of poor productivity of some wells has pushed toward significant efforts in recent years to study laboratory testing techniques and numerical modeling methods for predicting formation damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%