2013
DOI: 10.1653/024.096.0424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation ofLitchi chinensisfor Host Status toXyleborus glabratus(Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) and Susceptibility to Laurel Wilt Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The low X. glabratus population densities in areas where it and laurel wilt were present the longest suggest that it was not using other hosts for brood production or that the alternate hosts are unacceptable compared to redbay. Thus far X. glabratus has failed to produce brood in wood from trees outside the family Lauraceae (Mayfield & Hanula 2012;) even when they are strongly attracted to it (Kendra et al 2013a). However, some Lauraceae may not be acceptable hosts either.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The low X. glabratus population densities in areas where it and laurel wilt were present the longest suggest that it was not using other hosts for brood production or that the alternate hosts are unacceptable compared to redbay. Thus far X. glabratus has failed to produce brood in wood from trees outside the family Lauraceae (Mayfield & Hanula 2012;) even when they are strongly attracted to it (Kendra et al 2013a). However, some Lauraceae may not be acceptable hosts either.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plots located in the oldest infested areas with few or no large trees remaining had very low numbers of attacks. This raised the question -could X. glabratus populations survive after they eliminated all large redbay trees, since large sassafras are rare in the coastal plain where redbay grow and no other hosts outside of the Lauraceae have been found (Hanula et al 2008;Mayfield & Hanula 2011;Kendra et al 2013a;)? Also, if they do persist, how are they sustaining their populations?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Behavioral bioassays consisted of no-choice tests designed to document host recognition and boring behaviors, following published protocols [29] [30] . Assays were conducted at ABS under controlled laboratory conditions (25°C, 16:8 h L:D).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent evaluations indicated that L. chinensis , although attractive to X. glabratus due to chemical similarities with the Lauraceae, is not a suitable reproductive host. This is apparently due to the inability of lychee wood to support growth of R. lauricola , the presumed primary nutritional symbiont [30] . This latter work, in combination with other field studies of X. glabratus , provides evidence that dispersing females locate potential host trees based on their volatile emissions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, when given a choice between lychee wood and avocado wood (which emits less α-copaene), X. glabratus preferentially chose lychee wood during the first 4 h of the experiment but later switched to avocado. Further experiments demonstrated that X. glabratus does not reproduce in lychee, and the fungus R. lauricola does not develop in lychee wood [ 44 ]. This indicated that, although α -copaene is an important attractant for X. glabratus , it is not involved in the boring behavior of the beetle.…”
Section: Attractants For X Glabratusmentioning
confidence: 99%