1991
DOI: 10.1016/0169-8141(91)90018-h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of in-plant ergonomics training

Abstract: Plant personnel involved in a joint labor-management Ergonomics Pilot Project attended an introductory ergonomics course. The training was developed to provide trainees with the ergonomic knowledge necessary to perform their functions as part of the Ergonomic Pilot Project. A Train-the-Trainer program for Introductory Ergonomics was developed and implemented to provide Pilot Project plants with in-plant Introductory Ergonomics trainers. Trainee course satisfaction, ergonomic knowledge, and performance did not … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
3

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…25,26 Several studies report evidence of training effectiveness as improvements of scores on tests of knowledge about physical risk factors, the design of workspaces using ergonomics principles, and other ergonomics-related constructs. [27][28][29] In contrast, we evaluated a PE team's ability to characterize by observation the potential for musculoskeletal harm, using a process based on a conceptual understanding of ergonomics rather than the rote application of any particular formal exposure assessment instrument. In general, the agreement in VAS ratings of the potential for musculoskeletal harm to the low back, neck/ shoulder, elbows, and hand/wrist improved following training activities, although the observed effects were modest in size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25,26 Several studies report evidence of training effectiveness as improvements of scores on tests of knowledge about physical risk factors, the design of workspaces using ergonomics principles, and other ergonomics-related constructs. [27][28][29] In contrast, we evaluated a PE team's ability to characterize by observation the potential for musculoskeletal harm, using a process based on a conceptual understanding of ergonomics rather than the rote application of any particular formal exposure assessment instrument. In general, the agreement in VAS ratings of the potential for musculoskeletal harm to the low back, neck/ shoulder, elbows, and hand/wrist improved following training activities, although the observed effects were modest in size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to meet the committee goal of spreading the ergonomic training to all the plant population and in order to overcome the limited available resources, it was decided to use the approach of 'train the trainer' (Silverstein et al, 1991). Implementing this approach involved providing approximately 25 employees with a core knowledge of ergonomics.…”
Section: Employee Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De acordo com Haak (2000) Não existe um único formato de comitê de ergonomia (SILVERSTEIN et al, 1991;NAGAMACHI, 1995;MOORE e GARG, 1998, ST-VINCENT, CHICOINE e BEAUGRAND, 1998HAGG, 2003;TORMA-KRAJEWSKI et al, 2007;VILLENEUVE et al, 2007;ACOSTA e MORALES, 2008;NEUMANN, EKMAN e WINKEL., 2009). Guimarães (1999) A visão atual está em processo de evolução, e o empregado não é mais considerado como um recurso produtivo a par de maquinários que precise assegurar estabilidade e ótimo rendimento das tarefas pré-estabelecidas, mas sim está se transformando em um crescente influenciador do sucesso da empresa (FISCHER, 2002).…”
Section: -A Produtividade E Os Problemas Levantados Pela Temática Da unclassified
“…O CM é uma aplicação da e rgonomia com uma literatura que não pode ser considerada extensa, e sem uma metodologia de aplicação que seja unívoca (GUIMARÃES, 2000;OHCOW, 2001), sendo construído a partir das necessidades e das oportunidades especificas de cada situação de análise (SILVERSTEIN et al, 1991;NAGAMACHI, 1995;MOORE e GARG, 1998, ST-VINCENT, CHICOINE e BEAUGRAND, 1998HAGG, 2003;TORMA-KRAJEWSKI et al, 2007;VILLENEUVE et al, 2007;ACOSTA e MORALES, 2008;NEUMANN, EKMAN e WINKEL., 2009). -A existência de apoio e comprometimento constante, desde o início do projeto, dos que têm poder de decisão na organização (TORMA-KRAJEWSKI et al, 2007;VILLENEUVE et al, 2007, NEUMANN, EKMAN e WINKEL., 2009.…”
Section: Comitê De Melhorias (Cm)unclassified