2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of industrial based adsorbents for simultaneous removal of arsenic and fluoride from drinking water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
44
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
5
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the present study were compared with several other adsorbents, biochars, and biosorbents, and are given in Table . From the literature, it was found that the present study shows acceptable removal values in comparison to other research findings . The defluoridation capacity in the present study was superior over most of other adsorbents, only ammonium carbonate activated tamarind fruit shell carbon showed a comparable removal value of 83%.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 46%
“…The results of the present study were compared with several other adsorbents, biochars, and biosorbents, and are given in Table . From the literature, it was found that the present study shows acceptable removal values in comparison to other research findings . The defluoridation capacity in the present study was superior over most of other adsorbents, only ammonium carbonate activated tamarind fruit shell carbon showed a comparable removal value of 83%.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 46%
“…D-R model is expressed by Eqs. (15) and (16), where b is the activity coefficient related to mean sorption energy (mol 2 kJ À2 ); e is the Polanyi potential, R is the ideal gas constant, T is the absolute temperature and E (kJ mol À1 ) is defined as the free energy change required to transfer 1 mol of ions from solution to the solid surfaces, which equals to the following equation:…”
Section: Adsorption Isotherm Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, direct comparison of AICFA with other adsorbents is difficult, [3] Zirconium(iv)-impregnated groundnut (Anacardium occidentale) shell carbon 2.23 [64] Cynodon dactylon-based activated carbon 7.0 4.617 [65] Zirconium impregnated cashew nut (Anacardium occidental) shell carbon 7.0 1.83 [66] Sugarcane bagasse carbon [16] Phyllanthus embolic based thermally activated carbon 7.0 7.014 [67] Pecan (carya illinoinensis)nut shell carbon modified with egg shells calcium 7.0 1.61-2.51 [68] Scandinavia spruce wood modified with aluminum and iron oxides carbonized at 500°C 6.9 7.92 [69] Scandinavia spruce wood modified with aluminum and iron oxides carbonized at 650°C 6.9 5.67 [69] Scandinavia spruce wood modified with aluminum and iron oxides carbonized at 900°C 6.9 5.67 [69] Activated bagasse carbon 6.0 1.15 [15] Aluminum impregnated coconut fiber ash 5.0 a 3.192 a Current studied a Freundlich adsorption capacity. and it was found, in general, that the adsorption capacity of AICFA for fluoride ions is comparable with that of other adsorbents and in fact greater than certain adsorbents reported earlier.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Adsorbentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the world, it is estimated that more than 200 million people are exposed to drinking water with a fluoride concentration that exceeds the WHO guideline (1.5 mg.L -1 ) (Bhatnagar, Kumar, & Sillanpää, 2011). Many countries around the world such as India, Bangladesh, Nepal, Sénégal, USA, and Mexico are concerned by fluoride exposure because of the high numbers of their populations that present the effects caused by the high concentration of fluoride in their drinking water (Fawell et al, 2006;Bibi, Farooqi, Hussain, & Haider, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%