2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-012-9392-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of inelastic response of 3D single-story R/C frames under bi-directional excitation using different orientation schemes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[17][18][19], as well as of the inelastic response and damage level, e.g. [20][21][22][23][24]. In a preliminary study, Fontara et al [25] examined the interrelationship between commonly used seismic intensity measures and the Park and Ang overall structural damage index of an asymmetric 3D single-storey R/C building taking into account several incident angles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17][18][19], as well as of the inelastic response and damage level, e.g. [20][21][22][23][24]. In a preliminary study, Fontara et al [25] examined the interrelationship between commonly used seismic intensity measures and the Park and Ang overall structural damage index of an asymmetric 3D single-storey R/C building taking into account several incident angles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of their study indicated that damage induced to the buildings was affected by the incident angle as well as DI definition. This was also evaluated by Kostinakis and Athanatopoulou () for RC frames using modified Park and Ang () damage criteria. The results showed that the procedure of extreme stresses proposed by Kostinakis et al () was more efficient for the design of RC frame elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies investigated the critical incidence angle of the two horizontal components of earthquakes acting on r.c. framed buildings [6][7][8][9][10]. The results indicate that often the nonlinear dynamic response predicted by seismic codes is not conservative, deriving from the combination of effects due to the horizontal components applied separately along each structural axis (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%