2016
DOI: 10.1504/ijicbm.2016.074482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of information retrieval: precision and recall

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Efektivitas sistem temu kembali informasi dinilai berdasarkan teori dari Lancaster dalam Pendit (2008) dan Arora (2016) yaitu relevan dan tidak relevan. Dalam teori tersebut juga dijelaskan bahwa efektivitas sistem temu kembali informasi dikategorikan menjadi dua yaitu efektif jika nilainya di atas 50% dan tidak efektif jika nilainya di bawah 50%.…”
Section: Frekuensi Recall Melalui Opacunclassified
“…Efektivitas sistem temu kembali informasi dinilai berdasarkan teori dari Lancaster dalam Pendit (2008) dan Arora (2016) yaitu relevan dan tidak relevan. Dalam teori tersebut juga dijelaskan bahwa efektivitas sistem temu kembali informasi dikategorikan menjadi dua yaitu efektif jika nilainya di atas 50% dan tidak efektif jika nilainya di bawah 50%.…”
Section: Frekuensi Recall Melalui Opacunclassified
“…The terms true positive refers to the results containing the data present in the actual document and the predicted document. The False-positive refers to the results which contain the data which is not present in the actual document but is predicted by the experimentation (Arora, Kanjilal & Varshney, 2016). The recall is the ratio of true positives over predicted results and can be determined by the following formula given in the Eq.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is difficult to have objectivity to select the known IoT device types when configuring device list because device types are subjectively divided by device manufacturers. The types of IoT devices to be classified in this study were combined with those mentioned in the published papers and ArXiv document [4,5,8,11,12] do not support SSDP or have incomplete functions due to abusing cases (such as DDoS attacks) via SSDP. Hence, when a response is not received or device identification is unsuccessful, a scan method using the MDNS, NBNS protocols borrowed from a number of devices is used as alternative classification methods.…”
Section: Problem Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use precision and recall to evaluate the each methodology and compare the distinguishment accuracy between Nmap and UAIS. We choose precision and recall indicators because they are the popular indicators used to evaluate the performance of classification studies in the information retrieval academic field [12] Precision and recall are calculated by the following formulas. Table 4 shows the results of Nmap and UAIS distinguishment.…”
Section: Accuracy Of Distinguishmentmentioning
confidence: 99%