Evaluation of Institutional Research Productivity

Pal, Jiban K.; Sarkar, Sounik

doi:10.14429/djlit.40.01.14804

Cited by 5 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Several measures have been globally adopted to assess research productivity, including the quantification of indexed scientific publications [ 32 ]. Compared to the baseline period (1995-2005) (Figure 3 ), the period between 2011 and 2023 recorded approximately an overall 21-fold increase in the number of indexed publications, the major contributor being internal medicine.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Development of a Clinical Research Model Complementing Medical Residency and the Assessment of Research Productivity

Nair,

Al-Dahmani

2023

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and objective: Despite modern healthcare infrastructure, there is a paucity of information about the clinical research framework supporting healthcare in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Therefore, this study aimed to assess research performance productivity, and the clinical research framework, complementing medical residency, at the nation’s hub for clinical research. Methods: A cross-sectional retrospective review of records from the research database of the institution was conducted to assess productivity, and framework development, and data analyzed. Results: The migration of global healthcare providers, and the pharmaceutical industry offices, the adoption of the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) guidelines, and electronic medical records established a research culture. Following the development of the governance framework, a total of 1,328 research projects were submitted to the ethics committee until 2023. Approximately 63% of the total studies were of minimal risk, followed by industry-sponsored clinical trials (4.9%, 58/1,163), and prospective interventional studies (3.5%, 39/1,163). Almost half (48.3%, 28/58) of the total industry-sponsored clinical trials were phase II and phase III. The number of peer-reviewed indexed publications, a measure of research productivity, indicated that the periods between 2011 and 2015, 2016 and 2020, and 2021 and 2023 witnessed a 3.8-, 9.3-, and 7.9-fold increase compared to the baseline period (1995-2005). The implementation of the Focus on International Research Strategy, Teaching, Evaluation, and Mentoring (FIRSTEM) strategy, to accommodate mandatory research activity requirements for residents by the physician licensing boards, observed substantial increases in output. The number of international peer-reviewed indexed publications/resident projects doubled from 10.8% (2010-2015) to 24% (2016-2020) and reached 40.1% in 2023. Conclusion: This is the first research governance model established in the UAE, a country with an increasing prevalence of diabetes, and cardiovascular and genetic diseases. The model indicates that the medical trainees differentiate the best research evidence in making decisions about the clinical care of patients. The study outcomes may potentially be useful for other countries in developing a clinical research framework.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Development of a Clinical Research Model Complementing Medical Residency and the Assessment of Research Productivity

Nair,

Al-Dahmani

2023

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…According to Pal and Sarkar (2020), the available literature on the evaluation of R&D productivity of R&D institutions have been conducted utilizing secondary data viz. bibliographic data, intellectual databases and there exists a need to conduct similar studies on the comprehensive primary data; to be collected from the institutions.…”

Section: Particulars Of Public Sector Randd Performancementioning

confidence: 99%

A R&D productivity model to achieve self-sustainability for public funded/CSIR R&D laboratories, India

Kumari

Madhukar

Sahney

2023

IJPPM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The paper develops a model for enhancing R&D productivity for Indian public funded laboratories. The paper utilizes the productivity data of five Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) laboratories for analysis and to form the constructs of the model.Design/methodology/approach The weighted average method was employed for analyzing the rankings of survey respondents pertaining to the significant measures enhancing R&D involvement of researchers and significant non-R&D jobs. The authors have proposed a model of productivity. Various individual, organizational and environmental constructs related to the researchers working in the CSIR laboratories have been outlined that can enhance R&D productivity of researchers in Indian R&D laboratories. Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) was used to find the predictability of the productivity model.Findings The organizational factors have a crucial role in enhancing the R&D outputs of CSIR laboratories. The R&D productivity of researchers can be improved through implementing the constructs of the proposed model of productivity.Research limitations/implications The R&D productivity model can be adapted by the R&D laboratories to enhance researchers’ R&D involvement, increased R&D outputs and achieving self-sustenance in long run.Practical implications The R&D laboratories can initiate exercises to explore the most relevant factors and measures to enhance R&D productivity of their researchers. The constructs of the model can function as a guideline to introduce the most preferable research policies in the laboratory for overall mutual growth of laboratory and the researchers.Originality/value Hardly any studies have been found that have focused on finding the measures of enhancing R&D involvement of researchers and the influence of significant time-intensive jobs on researchers’ productivity.

show abstract

“…An evaluation study conducted on institutional research productivity by Pal and Sarkar [15] on Scientometrics, scientific visualization, and knowledge mapping of single-institutional studies and multi-institutional studies. The study compared global studies and Indian studies.…”

Section: Review Of Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of the Indian Top 10 Pharma Education Institutions Research Output Listed by National Institutional Ranking Framework (Nirf) 2020: A Scientometric Study

Kappi

Biradar

2021

Int J Pharm Pharm Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Higher Education System Rankings measure national higher education systems and meet a long-standing need to shift the discussion from the ranking of the NIRF top institutions to the best overall systems in each country, to reflect the country’s overall performance in NIRF rankings we propose a new Excellence/Quality indicator based on the excellence level reached by their Top Pharma education institutions within the Top positions of the NIRF weighted by the country’s size population. In the present study, we analyzed the Top 10 Pharma education institutions of the NIRF Ranking 2020. The first rank positioned by Hamdard University NIRF score of (80.5). SCOPUS database was used to extract the data and the study was limited to five years (2016-2019) which resulted in 7172 documents. The data analysis was performed using Biblioshiny, Microsoft excel, and VOS Viewer software, further data were explored using the bibliometrics tools and techniques. The study attempt to measure the top 10 Pharma Education Institution’s and their publications, Year-Wise distribution of research Output, document type, Highly Prolific Authors, Most Preferred Sources, Funding Agencies, Most Cited Papers, Most Productive and Most Cited Countries, and Highly Prolific Keywords based on the collected data. The analysis of the study indicates the highest publications with 2129, published by Institute of Chemical Technology-Mumbai; the most the productive year 2017 with 1508 publications; most of the publications are published as articles (6067); highly prolific author Sekar N with 194 papers, total citation 1954, h-index 22; preferred source title RSC Advance, 217 paper, total citation 2508, h-index 24; top funding agency University Grant Commission (UGC) 609 papers; top cited paper Shao Y, 2015, Molecular Physics; most productive and most cited country the USA.

show abstract

Evaluation of Institutional Research Productivity

Cited by 5 publications

References 37 publications

The Development of a Clinical Research Model Complementing Medical Residency and the Assessment of Research Productivity

The Development of a Clinical Research Model Complementing Medical Residency and the Assessment of Research Productivity

A R&D productivity model to achieve self-sustainability for public funded/CSIR R&D laboratories, India

Evaluation of the Indian Top 10 Pharma Education Institutions Research Output Listed by National Institutional Ranking Framework (Nirf) 2020: A Scientometric Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About