1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-3659(97)00201-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of intestinal pressure-controlled colon delivery capsule containing caffeine as a model drug in human volunteers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Caffeine Lee et al, 1996bMuraoka et al, 1998 on a protocol to establish a prospective relationship between plasma and saliva levels. On the basis of the application of an improved assay for 5-FU, the authors concluded that saliva PK was not predictive of plasma PK and therefore concluded that the utility of saliva was limited in establishing the risk of developing toxicity using the Mayo-regimen for 5-FU treatment.…”
Section: Selectivity Issues Specific To Salivamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Caffeine Lee et al, 1996bMuraoka et al, 1998 on a protocol to establish a prospective relationship between plasma and saliva levels. On the basis of the application of an improved assay for 5-FU, the authors concluded that saliva PK was not predictive of plasma PK and therefore concluded that the utility of saliva was limited in establishing the risk of developing toxicity using the Mayo-regimen for 5-FU treatment.…”
Section: Selectivity Issues Specific To Salivamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Caffeine) Muraoka et al (1998) have used salivary matrix to evaluate and define the PK parameters of a new delivery system, the pressurecontrolled colon delivery capsule (PCDC), using caffeine as the model drug. The appearance of caffeine in saliva (T i ) was targeted for the various PCDC relative to that of a plain gelatin capsule.…”
Section: Development Of Innovative Pk/pd Models For Patchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can be categorized as: (a) Prodrug approach (Riley & Turnberg, 1990;McLeod et al, 1994); (b) Pressure-based systems (Muraoka et al, 1998;Jeong et al, 2001); (c) The temporal control of delivery (Steed et al, 1997;Del Curto et al, 2009); (d) pH-based systems (Klein et al, 2005;Basak & Adhikari, 2009;Sareen et al, 2014), and (e) Enzyme-based systems (Xi et al, 2005;Varshosaz et al, 2006;Kshirsagar et al, 2011;Ramasamy et al, 2013;Rai et al, 2014). Polysaccharides which undergo hydrolysis of their glycosidic bonds by the microflora of the colon appear to be the most promising because of their attractive properties, such as wide availability, low cost of production, low toxicity and biodegradability (Chourasia & Jain, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the transit time in small intestine for the preparation is surprisingly constant at 3±1 h and appears to be independent of the types of the preparations and whether subjects are fed or not (Halsas et al, 2001;Muraoka, Shimokawa, 1998). Based on these understandings, we designed the enteric timedependent colon-specific drug delivery system to achieve a considerable drug release after the preparation's arrival into the colon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%