1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-9236(98)00064-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of intranets in a distributed environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of perceived intranet effectiveness, the mean value for all items of the three dimensions measuring intranet effectiveness is well above 3 and hence signifies that respondents were generally agreed that the intranet that are being used in their agencies are effective in terms of enhancing business operation, promoting the desired organizational culture and facilitating collaboration among organizational members (Table 4). This finding is consistent with that of Lai & Mahapatra (1998), Weber (2002, Murgolo-Poore et al (2003) and Knight et al, (2005).…”
Section: Descriptive Statisticssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In terms of perceived intranet effectiveness, the mean value for all items of the three dimensions measuring intranet effectiveness is well above 3 and hence signifies that respondents were generally agreed that the intranet that are being used in their agencies are effective in terms of enhancing business operation, promoting the desired organizational culture and facilitating collaboration among organizational members (Table 4). This finding is consistent with that of Lai & Mahapatra (1998), Weber (2002, Murgolo-Poore et al (2003) and Knight et al, (2005).…”
Section: Descriptive Statisticssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Various studies have empirically demonstrated the benefits and merits of intranet adoption both at the firm level and individual level perspectives. Benefits at the firm level perspectives relates to the effect of intranet on organizational performances such as productivity improvements, cost savings, and enhanced customer service (Lai & Mahapatra, 1998;Leung, Chong & Cheng, 2000;Azzone & Bianchi, 2000;Buchanan-Oliver et al 2000;Knight et al, 2005;Kefos & Riedl, 2005). In contrast, benefit at the individual level perspective denotes the effect of intranet on individual performances such as individual productivity, individual efficiency, and individual effectiveness (Lai & Mahapatra, 1998;Kjernald, 2002;Weber, 2002;Kefos & Riedl, 2005;Daniel & Ward, 2005;Deltour, 2005).…”
Section: Intranet Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many intranets are little more than electronic bulletin boards, actual use is sporadic at best, and the technology is used primarily to share internal documents (cf. Lai and Mahapatra, 1998;Newell et al, 1999). It is thus not surprising to see headlines such as 'Why do intranets fail?'…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[38]). Employees must be willing to share and trust others to share [8]. Management must realize that knowledge must be nurtured, supported, enhanced, and cared for [2].…”
Section: Organizational Culture and Intranetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An intranet supports KM in at least three ways: (1) providing compression of time and space among the users, (2) offering the flexibility to exchange information, and (3) supporting information transfers and organizational networking independent of direct contacts between users (cf. [8]). Scott [9] developed a theoretical framework that suggests the multiple ways intranets support knowledge and gives numerous examples, including the inclusion of timely information, metaphors, analogies, prototypes, discussion threads, debates, video clips, animation, and online databases on the intranet.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%