2013
DOI: 10.1136/vr.101086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of intraocular pressure in conscious ferrets (Mustela putorius furo) by means of rebound tonometry and comparison with applanation tonometry

Abstract: To determine normal intraocular pressure (IOP) values by means of rebound tonometry in unanaesthetised ferrets, and to compare rebound and applanation tonometry, 55 clinically healthy ferrets were included in an observational, prospective, blinded study. On 52 ferrets, IOP was measured by means of rebound and applanation tonometry. On 3 ferrets, rebound tonometry was performed every two hours over a 24-hour period. Mean IOPs of the 104 eyes obtained with the rebound tonometer were 14.07±0.35 (95% CI 13.37 to 1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noteworthy that the sample showed phenotypic homogeneity, and with a substantial number of animals for this species, the results should be reliable. Although the STT was conducted shortly after anesthesia, we cannot rule out the influence of the drug used on the results obtained, since anesthetics lead to a decrease in tear production (Girolamo et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noteworthy that the sample showed phenotypic homogeneity, and with a substantial number of animals for this species, the results should be reliable. Although the STT was conducted shortly after anesthesia, we cannot rule out the influence of the drug used on the results obtained, since anesthetics lead to a decrease in tear production (Girolamo et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[46][47][48] In healthy dairy cattle, the mean ± SD IOP as determined by applanation tonometry was 26.9 ± 6.7 mm Hg (range, 16 to 42 mm Hg). 29 Thus, given that IOP varies among species, it is important to establish a reference interval for IOP in each individual species. [46][47][48] Among all species, the highest mean IOP reported was 32.1 ± 10.4 mm Hg in a rhinoceros, 34 and the lowest mean IOP recorded was 3 mm Hg in a chinchilla.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, the CV is commonly used to determine the precision of a measurement instrument, to our knowledge prior to the present study, only 1 study 51 had assessed the CV for IOP in a species of veterinary interest (ie, cats). 52 In a study 29 in which rebound tonometry was used to measure the IOP of conscious ferrets, there was a study-ordered decrease in the CV. The mean intra-assay and interassay CVs and the associated 95% CIs (Tables 3 and 4) were within acceptable limits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chemical restraint is rarely required for a simple ophthalmic examination, including intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement, but may be needed if more invasive diagnostic procedures are performed or if the ferret is especially aggressive. 2 Because specific literature on the effects of most anesthetic drugs on the ocular parameters of ferrets is lacking, effects similar to those demonstrated in other domestic animals should be assumed. For noninvasive ophthalmic testing procedures, the use of midazolam or butorphanol alone is sufficient.…”
Section: Ocular Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%