Evaluation of IPv6 transition mechanisms using QoS service policies

Smith, Luke; Jacobi, Mark; Al-Khayatt, Samir

doi:10.1109/csndsp.2018.8471772

Cited by 8 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Furthermore, the researcher in [8] measured the processing time by using the atomic and kernel-space method to evaluate the performance of the transition techniques. However, the author in [9] studied the performance of the QoS in the transition techniques and the researchers in [10] focuses on the performance of the transition mechanism on the VoIP & SIP protocols.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Comparative Performance Evaluation of IPv4/IPv6 Using Network Simulation and Virtualization Tools

Almutlaq¹,

Elfadil²

2022

IJCSMC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Internet users are expected to grow from 4.5 billion in 2020 to 5.3 billion by 2023. In terms of the population, this represents 66% of the global population. However, the growth of connected devices and internet users is going very fast. Not yet as the number of the internet of things (IoT) applications such as video surveillance, smart meters, and tracking and the machine to machine increased as well. The address space of the IPv4 cannot meet these requirements and this growth in the connected devices. According to that another IP address scheme designed to meet the requirements and the needs for the IoT & M2M and the growth of the number of internet users. This is the IPv6 which consist of 128 bit and can provide a huge number of addresses. The limitation of the addressing space was solved by the IPv6 but the problem arises in the migration from IPv4 to IPv6 as the migration cannot happen overnight so transition mechanisms developed to allow the communication between both IPv4 and IPv6 network. This paper aims to study the performance parameters such as the delay, the throughput, and the TCP establishment time which could be affected by the transition mechanism. The methodology that used in this project is using a network simulation tools such as GNS3 and virtual box to simulate the network scenarios and network performance check such as Wireshark and iperf3 tools to analyse the traffic. The results in this project show that if the delay is the main concern, then the tunneling machine will be the best choice, behind that when the TCP flow playing an important role for the network engineer then the tunneling machine will be the best option. However, the dual-stack method is considered the best in terms of throughput.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Comparative Performance Evaluation of IPv4/IPv6 Using Network Simulation and Virtualization Tools

Almutlaq¹,

Elfadil²

2022

IJCSMC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…VoIP's QoS transition from an IP Version 6 (IPv6) network to an IP Version 4 (IPv4) network maintained its quality through the IP network tunnelling process. No substantial delay was noticed where it could have impacted the quality of VoIP phone calls [19].…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Optimizing DSCP Marking to Ensure VoIP’s QoS over HFC Network

Daoud¹,

Qu²

2019

9th International Conference on Computer Science, Engineering and Applications (CCSEA 2019)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Three major factors that can affect Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) phone services' quality, these include packet delay, packet loss, and jitter. The focus of this study is specific to the VoIP phone services offered to customers by cable companies that utilize broadband hybrid fiber coaxial (HFC) networks. HFC networks typically carry three types of traffic that include voice, data, and video. Unlike data and video, some delays or packet loss can result in a noticeable degraded impact on a VoIP's phone conversation. We will examine various differentiated services code point (DSCP) marking, then analyze and assess their impact on VoIP's quality of service (QoS). This study mimics the production environment. It examines the relationship between specific DSCP marking's configuration. This research avoids automated test calls and rather focuses on human made call testing. This study relies on users' experience and the captured data to support this research's findings.

show abstract

“…Due to the rapid growth of population demand for IP addresses has increased more and more [1][2][3]. Eventually, IP addresses of IPv4 pool is completely exhausted.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of IPv4 and IPv6 Networks with Different Modified Tunneling Techniques using OPNET

Babar¹,

Zardari²,

Hussaini³

et al. 2019

IJACSA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Currently, all the devices are using Internet protocol version 4 (IPv4) to access the internet. IP addresses of the IPv4 are now depleted from IPv4 pool announced by IANA (Internet Assigned Number Authority) in February 2011. To solve this issue Internet protocol version 6 (IPv6) is launched. But the main problem is current devices can't support directly IPv6 that causes various compatibility issues. Many researchers have proposed various techniques, but still, their efficiency and performance is a big challenge. This study examines several mechanisms of transition IPv6 the backbone of multiprotocol label switching (MPLS) to evaluate & compare their performances. It involves comparing different performance metrics and manual tunneling tunnel efficiency metrics. The main goal of this paper is to examine the dissimilar tunneling techniques and find out which tunneling method is better in all performance, which increases network performance. Experimental results show that ISATAP is better performance in all metrics.

show abstract

Evaluation of IPv6 transition mechanisms using QoS service policies

Cited by 8 publications

References 9 publications

A Comparative Performance Evaluation of IPv4/IPv6 Using Network Simulation and Virtualization Tools

A Comparative Performance Evaluation of IPv4/IPv6 Using Network Simulation and Virtualization Tools

Optimizing DSCP Marking to Ensure VoIP’s QoS over HFC Network

Assessment of IPv4 and IPv6 Networks with Different Modified Tunneling Techniques using OPNET

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About