2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of lactate, white blood cell count, neutrophil count, procalcitonin and immature granulocyte count as biomarkers for sepsis in emergency department patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
40
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ha et al found a similar cutoff value for IG% (0.5%) when evaluating IG% ability to discriminate between complicated and uncomplicated sepsis compared to other biomarkers (white blood cells, C‐reactive protein, lactate, and procalcitonin concentrations). Another study, comparing lactate, white blood cell (WBC) and neutrophil count, procalcitonin and immature granulocyte (IG) count for the prediction of sepsis, and severe sepsis or septic shock, established a 0.2% cutoff for IG%, with 67.0% specificity and 45.7% sensitivity . However, in clinical practice, the implementation of such low cutoff values would increase the false‐positive diagnosis, as demonstrated by the low specificity found in the present study through ROC analyses (45.5% for IG% of 0.3% and 29.5% for IG% of 0.4%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Ha et al found a similar cutoff value for IG% (0.5%) when evaluating IG% ability to discriminate between complicated and uncomplicated sepsis compared to other biomarkers (white blood cells, C‐reactive protein, lactate, and procalcitonin concentrations). Another study, comparing lactate, white blood cell (WBC) and neutrophil count, procalcitonin and immature granulocyte (IG) count for the prediction of sepsis, and severe sepsis or septic shock, established a 0.2% cutoff for IG%, with 67.0% specificity and 45.7% sensitivity . However, in clinical practice, the implementation of such low cutoff values would increase the false‐positive diagnosis, as demonstrated by the low specificity found in the present study through ROC analyses (45.5% for IG% of 0.3% and 29.5% for IG% of 0.4%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Studies have indicated that the IGC and IG% reflect an infection-related response and may be associated with mortality. 11 Studies on the role of inflammatory biomarkers in the assessment of massive bleeding have increased in recent years. In a present study, a positive correlation between increased CRP values and gastrointestinal bleeding has been shown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IG and its derivatives are known to be new systemic inflammation biomarkers expressed in various conditions such as systemic inflammation. 11 , 21 A study states that the IG% showed appendicitis complications with low sensitivity and high specificity. 22 A study by Kong et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations