2018
DOI: 10.1007/s12088-018-0753-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Lactobacilli for Antagonistic Activity Against the Growth, Adhesion and Invasion of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Gardnerella vaginalis

Abstract: Urinary tract infections are the most common infectious diseases in babies and the elderly and are often acquired as nosocomial infections. The purpose of the present study was to identify strains of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) which could be used as alternatives to antibiotics for the treatment of urinary tract infections because of their ability to inhibit urinary tract pathogens (Klebsiella pneumoniae BCRC 10694 and Gardnerella vaginalis BCRC 17040). We screened 370 LAB strains using spent culture supernatan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(24 reference statements)
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a study [38], three strains of Lactobacillus isolated from cocoa fermentation had an activity against G. vaginalis ATCC 49154 using the agar diffusion technique and the supernatant halos of L. plantarum 6.2 and L. plantarum 7.1 were 12 and 11 mm, respectively. Another research showed that the CFS of some LAB had an inhibitory effect on the growth of G. vaginalis BCRC 17040 (inhibition diameter was about 2-3 mm) [39]. In above three research, the inhibition zone against G. vaginalis was about 3 mm after subtracting the well diameter, and the result in our study was 1.46 to 3.02 mm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…In a study [38], three strains of Lactobacillus isolated from cocoa fermentation had an activity against G. vaginalis ATCC 49154 using the agar diffusion technique and the supernatant halos of L. plantarum 6.2 and L. plantarum 7.1 were 12 and 11 mm, respectively. Another research showed that the CFS of some LAB had an inhibitory effect on the growth of G. vaginalis BCRC 17040 (inhibition diameter was about 2-3 mm) [39]. In above three research, the inhibition zone against G. vaginalis was about 3 mm after subtracting the well diameter, and the result in our study was 1.46 to 3.02 mm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Second, the two selected conventional probiotic hosts, L. delbrueckii and L. gasseri (our laboratory stock), were isolated from yogurt and human milk, respectively, revealing that the two strains originate from natural and safe sources. Finally, L. delbrueckii has been shown previously to display both antibacterial activities and detoxification capacity against uremic toxins in vitro [ 28 , 40 ]. As for L. gasseri (our laboratory stock), we confirmed that the milk-isolated L. gasseri can display anti-bacterial activities, as well as both bile salt and acid tolerance abilities in our preliminary analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we provide new support that L. delbrueckii may also secrete bacteriocin, but this needs to be further investigated. On the other hand, the previous study also indicated that L. delbrueckii is not active against the growth of G. vaginalis , an important etiology of bacterial vaginosis in humans [ 28 ]. Thus, it will be interesting to test the antibacterial potency of our recombinant L. delbrueckii/HLF and L. delbrueckii/BLF clones against the growth of G. vaginalis in our next study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, 35 Lactobacillus species meet the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) criteria for a qualified presumption of safety (QPS) [ 12 ]. Due to their cholesterol-lowering properties [ 13 , 14 ], anti-inflammatory [ 15 ], antioxidant [ 16 ], and antagonistic activity [ 17 , 18 , 19 ], LAB are used in the prevention and treatment of many diseases, such as irritable bowel syndrome [ 20 ], dysbiosis [ 18 ], urinary tract infections [ 17 ], antibiotic-associated diarrhea, infectious diarrhea [ 21 ], allergies [ 15 ], and atopic dermatitis [ 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%