2011
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/332/1/012025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of LDA Ensembles Classifiers for Brain Computer Interface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Area Under Curve (AUC) [57] Calculated by mean and variance Area under ROC curve, generally between 0.5 and 1…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Methods For General Bci Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Area Under Curve (AUC) [57] Calculated by mean and variance Area under ROC curve, generally between 0.5 and 1…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Methods For General Bci Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(6) How to evaluate the performance of BCI customized for specific users Although there are some criteria for evaluating or reporting BCI performance [57], mainly from the technical perspective, BCI is directly controlled by a specific user's brain signals to improve the user's work efficiency and quality of life. Therefore, it is also necessary to combine user-centered BCI evaluation methods to develop a BCI that the user is satisfied with.…”
Section: Challenges Faced By Personalized Bcimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An ensemble SWLDA classifier was first proposed by Johnson et al and evaluated on their own P300-based BCI data (6480 training ERP data) [27] . Arjona et al evaluated a variety of ensemble LDA classifiers using 3024 training data [28] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ensembled Learning improves classification accuracy and stability by combining the strengths of multiple models. The most widely used ensemble learning methods such as Bagging [24],…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%