2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2014.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of leaching potential of three systemic neonicotinoid insecticides in vineyard soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The shape of BTCs for cymoxanil in the unamended soil with short final tails was considered similar to that found for the conservative ion, and indicates a rapid leaching kinetics due to the weak interaction between this polar fungicide and the unamended soil. Similar BTCs have been obtained for the leaching of other polar fungicides, herbicides (Rodríguez-Cruz et al, 2011) or insecticides (Kurwadkar et al, 2014) in soils of different characteristics. The adsorption of polar compounds by soils is usually low, and it could decrease in column leaching experiments compared to batch adsorption experiments.…”
Section: Leaching Of Cymoxanil In Unamended and Sms-amended Soil Colusupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The shape of BTCs for cymoxanil in the unamended soil with short final tails was considered similar to that found for the conservative ion, and indicates a rapid leaching kinetics due to the weak interaction between this polar fungicide and the unamended soil. Similar BTCs have been obtained for the leaching of other polar fungicides, herbicides (Rodríguez-Cruz et al, 2011) or insecticides (Kurwadkar et al, 2014) in soils of different characteristics. The adsorption of polar compounds by soils is usually low, and it could decrease in column leaching experiments compared to batch adsorption experiments.…”
Section: Leaching Of Cymoxanil In Unamended and Sms-amended Soil Colusupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Degradation in sediments is faster for newly developed compounds like cycloxaprid (Liu et al, 2015). Up to 6% of imidacloprid residues in soil can be transported in runoff after storm events (Thuyet et al, 2012), but most of the residual chemical would remain in the applied field, from where it moves readily into ground waters, particularly thiamethoxam, imidacloprid, clothianidin (González-Pradas et al, 2002;Miranda et al, 2011;Bajeer et al, 2012) and dinotefuran (Kurwadkar et al, 2014). The increasing use of products containing neonicotinoids and their repeated application as coated seeds in agricultural fields (Douglas and Tooker, 2015) adds every year a new layer of residues to the soil, and hence to the waters, where residue levels are a reflection of those present in soil at any time (Hladik et al, 2014;Schaafsma et al, 2015).…”
Section: Impacts At the Population Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiment showed that DOC reduced IMD retardation and increased its leaching potential [ 17 ]. Also, a recent soil column study comparing pulse solutions with individual-solute and mixed-solutes showed that leaching potential for selected neonicotinoids followed IMD < TMX < DTN, with their mobility strongly correlated with the pesticide’s solubility in water [ 18 ]. Furthermore, our data on IMD soil batch kinetics and equilibria, as well as degradation rates in sandy soils of Florida showed that IMD had a moderate-to-weak sorption and persistence in these soils [ 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%