2004
DOI: 10.1115/1.1834619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Leak-Before-Break (LBB) Behavior For Axially Notched X65 and X80 Line Pipes

Abstract: Leak-before-break (LBB) behavior was evaluated for two series of API 5L X65 line pipes and three series of X80 line pipes with various levels of Charpy V-notch (CVN) absorbed energy. Full-scale hydrostatic burst tests were conducted for the line pipes with an axial through-wall (TW) notch to determine LBB criteria, that is, the relationship between the axial TW notch length and hoop stress for LBB. The determined LBB criteria were verified by full-scale partial gas burst tests for line pipes with an axial part… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kawaguchi et al 5 carried out similar hydrostatic burst tests for axially TW notched pipes and demonstrated, based on the experimental results, that the equation proposed by Kiefner et al is not applicable to some of the recent higher strength and higher toughness pipes. In other words, most previous studies evaluating the leakage or rupture criteria have been conducted solely on the basis of pipe test results; therefore, the dominant factor determining the failure behaviour of notched linepipes has not necessarily been elucidated by these studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kawaguchi et al 5 carried out similar hydrostatic burst tests for axially TW notched pipes and demonstrated, based on the experimental results, that the equation proposed by Kiefner et al is not applicable to some of the recent higher strength and higher toughness pipes. In other words, most previous studies evaluating the leakage or rupture criteria have been conducted solely on the basis of pipe test results; therefore, the dominant factor determining the failure behaviour of notched linepipes has not necessarily been elucidated by these studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Figure 7 shows the relationship between the stress triaxiality and the maximum equivalent plastic strain in the wall thickness during the three point Hydrostatic tests of the pipes with an axial TW notch machined in the base metal were performed at room temperature: three tests were carried out for pipe A and two tests for pipe B. 5 The lengths of the axial TW notches machined in the test pipes (2a 0 ) were 250, 300, and 400 mm for pipe A, and 250 and 350 mm for pipe B. As shown in the schematic view of the axial TW notch in Fig.…”
Section: Finite Element Analyses Of Static Three Point Bending Test Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LBB design philosophy used for high pressure vessel and related energy plant equipment has been attracting much interest from a safety and economic point of view. 2 Kawaguchi et al 3 reported that LBB is one of the three fracture modes concerning burst behavior of notched gas pipelines. LBB concept is part of break preclusion (BP) concept in Germany.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, by performing surface-cracked pipe tests (Case 1 and Case 2 in Fig. 1), it was demonstrated that pipe rupture could occur for cases where leak was predicted using the original criterion (7) . In addition, limited surface-cracked pipe tests (8) have…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The start of ductile tearing, technically the "initiation of the fracture event", can occur Fig. 1 Leak/rupture analysis results for X80 line-pipe steel (7) at much lower pressures than the maximum failure pressure. In the 1960's and early 1970's when these original equations were developed, instrumentation techniques were not available to monitor the start of ductile tearing and stable crack growth up to the maximum pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%