1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-4238(97)00108-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of lemon cultivars and acid lime × lemon hybrids for resistance to Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
3
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
3
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…were grapefruit (C. paradisi), sweet orange (C. sinensis), Clementine mandarin (C. clementina), and sweet Lime (C. aurantifolia), which are acknowledged as having greater susceptibility compared with other species, as shown in previous studies (1,19). In contrast, among the most resistant species of citrus were manda- rin (C. reticulata), Satsuma mandarin (C. unshiu), and lemon (C. limon), which also confirms previous reports (1,19,43,47). However, it should also be pointed out that a few genotypes of C. sinensis were more resistant than some genotypes of C. reticulata, C. unshiu, and C. limon, and some genotypes of C. sinensis were as susceptible as C. paradisi, C. clementina, and C. aurantifolia (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…were grapefruit (C. paradisi), sweet orange (C. sinensis), Clementine mandarin (C. clementina), and sweet Lime (C. aurantifolia), which are acknowledged as having greater susceptibility compared with other species, as shown in previous studies (1,19). In contrast, among the most resistant species of citrus were manda- rin (C. reticulata), Satsuma mandarin (C. unshiu), and lemon (C. limon), which also confirms previous reports (1,19,43,47). However, it should also be pointed out that a few genotypes of C. sinensis were more resistant than some genotypes of C. reticulata, C. unshiu, and C. limon, and some genotypes of C. sinensis were as susceptible as C. paradisi, C. clementina, and C. aurantifolia (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…However, due to some species and hybrids being represented by only a single genotype, some caution should be taken when making assumptions about the relative susceptibilities of different species, although the results are in agreement with those previously reported for Citrus spp. (1,10,19,43,47).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(Williamson and Kumar, 2006). Prasad et al, (1997) claimed Rough lemon and Trifoliate orange as resistant rootstocks against T. semipenetrans but the results of the present study contradict this claim in the case of Rough lemon but were in accordance in case of Trifoliate orange. Rootstocks responding differently against T. semipenetrans shows that there is one foremost gene or a multiple tandem gene participating in the development of resistance against T. semipenetrans.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…There are other reports from Florida of C. medica displaying susceptibility to ACC (Gottwald et al, 1993), which is in agreement with our study. A Pakistani report indicated that most lemons (C. limon, which are C. medica hybrids, and were highly susceptible in our study) were resistant to all but one isolate of Xcc tested (Prasad et al, 1997). A second report from Pakistan also indicated that the one C. maxima accession tested displayed no ACC symptoms (Sarkar et al, 2007).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%