2021
DOI: 10.3389/frsc.2021.582431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Lettuce Growth, Yield, and Economic Viability Grown Vertically on Unutilized Building Wall in Dhaka City

Abstract: Production of safe food in the densely populated areas of the developing countries is the most challenging issue due to the speedy urbanization, fragile food transportation facilities, and reduced farmlands. Given this background, a study was conducted to evaluate the agronomic properties and economic viability of lettuce grown vertically in the wall of building in Dhaka city, Bangladesh. Two lettuce cultivars (V1: Green wave and V2: New red fire) and three organic growing media (P1: 40% soil + 40% vermicompos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increasing the pot substrate volume from 5 to 8 L per lettuce plant led to a significant increase in plant fresh and dry weight (g), plant volume (cm3), head fresh weight (g) and head density (g/cm), total chlorophyll content (spad), N, P, K and Ca (ppm) contents while reducing the nitrate content of lettuce plants. These results agreed with those of Cardoso et al, (2015), Sayed et al, (2017), andIslam et al, (2021). Instead of the mentioned significant positive effects of the pot substrate volume, the economic impact didn't meet the same positive effect.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Increasing the pot substrate volume from 5 to 8 L per lettuce plant led to a significant increase in plant fresh and dry weight (g), plant volume (cm3), head fresh weight (g) and head density (g/cm), total chlorophyll content (spad), N, P, K and Ca (ppm) contents while reducing the nitrate content of lettuce plants. These results agreed with those of Cardoso et al, (2015), Sayed et al, (2017), andIslam et al, (2021). Instead of the mentioned significant positive effects of the pot substrate volume, the economic impact didn't meet the same positive effect.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Here, B 0  0 t/ha; B 1  2.10 t/ha; B 2  6.20 t/ha and B 3  10.30 t/ha, Vc 0  0 t/ha; Vc 1  4.1 t/ha; Vc 2  8.20 t/ha Most cost-effective production procedure is the most useful information for farmers, particularly, small scale farmers. The incentives of farmers in food productions are cost effective production, better quality produce and increased net returns (Islam et al, 2021). In this research, it is seeking the production of safe food and assist the rural producers in obtaining greater monetary returns, encouraging them to continue in the agricultural activity in sustainable way.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%