2017
DOI: 10.15672/hjms.2017.420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of life quality by integrated method of AHP and TOPSIS based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets

Abstract: In this study, we present an integrated method of Analytical Hierarchy Process based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets (IT2FAHP) and Technique for Order Performance by Similarity to Ideal Solution based on on interval type-2 fuzzy sets (IT2FTOPSIS). The applicability of the proposed integrated method was performed on a case study of evaluation of life quality for 28 European Union Countries and other six countries, Iceland, Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, Turkey and Kosovo, in terms of 30 subjective criteria. The w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is based on selection of alternative which has the shortest distance from the positive-ideal solution and the farthest distance from the negative-ideal solution. The steps of the TOPSIS method for a MCDM problem involving m alternatives and n criteria as follows (Chen, 2000;Opricovic and Tzeng, 2004;Şahin and Pehlivan, 2017):…”
Section: Topsis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is based on selection of alternative which has the shortest distance from the positive-ideal solution and the farthest distance from the negative-ideal solution. The steps of the TOPSIS method for a MCDM problem involving m alternatives and n criteria as follows (Chen, 2000;Opricovic and Tzeng, 2004;Şahin and Pehlivan, 2017):…”
Section: Topsis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kahraman et al (2014) introduced IT2F AHP as an extension of type-1 fuzzy AHP. The IT2F-based AHP was used for different implementation purposes (Sahin and Yapici Pehlivan, 2017; Kaya and Aycin, 2021).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moving to the third phase, alternatives were evaluated by constructing the fuzzy decision matrices using linguistic terms and the weighted matrices. Subsequently, the fuzzy ideal positive and negative solutions are calculated and compared with the relative closeness rations of the alternatives [22].…”
Section: Hybrid Fuzzy Mcdm Techniques and General Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other side, the alternatives are compared using the TOPSIS method and the result is integrated with the AHP results in the decision matrix. Furthermore, the ideal negative and positive solutions were calculated, and the alternatives' relative closeness is calculated in order to rank them [22].…”
Section: Model Designmentioning
confidence: 99%