2002
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2002.tb01532.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EVALUATION OF LIGHT DETECTION AND RANGING (LIDAR) FOR MEASURING RIVER CORRIDOR TOPOGRAPHY1

Abstract: LIDAR is relatively new in the commercial market for remote sensing of topography and it is difficult to find objective reporting on the accuracy of LIDAR measurements in an applied context. Accuracy specifications for LIDAR data in published evaluations range from 1 to 2 m root mean square error (RMSEx,y) and 15 to 20 cm RMSEz. Most of these estimates are based on measurements over relatively flat, homogeneous terrain. This study evaluated the accuracy of one LIDAR data set over a range of terrain types in a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, its potential in fluvial geomorphology [21,22], floodplain mapping [16], soil science [23], and wetland mapping [24][25][26][27] have begun to be explored. However, within the coastal marsh environment, the ability of TLS systems to resolve centimeter-level elevation differences between the vegetation and the bare earth surface is limited [28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, its potential in fluvial geomorphology [21,22], floodplain mapping [16], soil science [23], and wetland mapping [24][25][26][27] have begun to be explored. However, within the coastal marsh environment, the ability of TLS systems to resolve centimeter-level elevation differences between the vegetation and the bare earth surface is limited [28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bowen and Waltermire (2002) documented lidar overestimation of bare-ground elevation in wetlands was most pronounced in areas of dense riparian vegetation with steep bank slopes. Toyra and others (2003) evaluated lidar technology for hydrological applications in wetlands in northeastern Alberta and observed that lidar data did not reflect accurate ground elevations in areas with thick willow cover and dense layers of graminoids (grasses and sedges), even after the bare-ground lidar elevations were adjusted for bias with a block adjustment.…”
Section: Light Detection and Ranging Data Quality Control And Adjustmentmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…thin shrub/ scrub lands and mixed vegetation types), and very short-statured (i.e. grasslands), lidar systems may not be able to detect centimeter-level height differences between vegetation and ground surface (Bowen & Waltermire 2002) and may decrease accuracies of lidar derived DEMs (Hodgson & Bresnahan 2004, Reutebuch et al 2003. However, studies in short stature environments have reported variable effects of vegetation while some studies indicated minimum or no significant vegetation effects (Montane & Torres 2006) on the accuracies of terrain estimates using lidar.…”
Section: Effects Of Vegetation On Laser Scanning and Lidar Data Effecmentioning
confidence: 99%