2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-012-0331-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of liquefaction potential hazard of Chennai city, India: using geological and geomorphological characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wakamatsu (1992) grouped sedimentary deposits into three categories of liquefaction susceptibility (likely, possible and not likely) using geomorphological criteria and classifying geomorphological units such as natural levee, former river channel, sandy dry river channel and artificial fill as the highest level of liquefaction potential. Witter et al (2006) and Ganapathy and Rajawat (2012) combined geomorphic expression and geological characteristics to define and distinguish lithological units and to produce liquefaction susceptibility maps for the central San Francisco Bay region (USA) and Chennai city (India), respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wakamatsu (1992) grouped sedimentary deposits into three categories of liquefaction susceptibility (likely, possible and not likely) using geomorphological criteria and classifying geomorphological units such as natural levee, former river channel, sandy dry river channel and artificial fill as the highest level of liquefaction potential. Witter et al (2006) and Ganapathy and Rajawat (2012) combined geomorphic expression and geological characteristics to define and distinguish lithological units and to produce liquefaction susceptibility maps for the central San Francisco Bay region (USA) and Chennai city (India), respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deltaic plains, interdistributary marshes, paleochannels, younger levees adjacent to the River Hoogly and older levees on both the sides of the old Adi Ganga are the important geomorphological units (Roy et al, 2012), as depicted in Fig. 14. Youd and Perkins (1978) classified the geomorphological units with affinity to high, moderate and low susceptibility to liquefaction, with the maximum likelihood in deltas, river channels and uncompacted artificial fills, whereas Ganapathy and Rajawat (2012) asserted abandoned river channel to be "likely" liquefiable. Thus, in Kolkata, all geomorphological units have potential liquefaction susceptibility during strong seismic shaking.…”
Section: Geomorphology Of Kolkatamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corresponding weights, the ranks of each thematic layer, and the theme attribute score thereof are assigned values according to the apparent contribution of the layers to the overall seismic hazard. For example, in the geomorphology theme, with regard to severity to liquefaction, we have assigned a ranking of "high" to swampy land, water bodies and river channels and "low" to paleochannel (Youd and Perkins, 1978;Ganapathy and Rajawat, 2012). In the sediment class, considering the effect on the FOS, higher rank is assigned to sand, clayey sand and silty sand, whereas Figure 24.…”
Section: Multicriteria Seismic Hazard Microzonation Of Kolkatamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive studies have been performed to determine the liquefaction potential of granular or nonplastic fine-grained soils previously. Experimental methods based on field experiments (Moss et al, 2006), laboratory tests (Monkul et al, 2015), experimental methods based on geomorphological and geological characteristics (Ganapathy and Rajawat (2012)), numerical methods (Jafarian et al, 2011) and methods based on artificial intelligence (Goh, 1994) are among the tools introduced for liquefaction hazard investigations. Yilmaz and Yavuzer (2005) presented liquefaction potential and susceptibility maps for the city of Yalova, Turkey.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%