2002
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200203000-00001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Low-Energy Extracorporeal Shock-Wave Application for Treatment of Chronic Plantar Fasciitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

5
90
1
11

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
90
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Extracorporeal shock-wave treatments have been applied to patients with chronic plantar fasciitis who have failed to respond to multiple conservative pharmacologic and therapeutic interventions [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] . Recent randomized, controlled stud- ies have been published but with varying results because of differences in study design, direction of the shock-wave delivery, energy levels, size (volume) of the focused energy ellipsoid (f 2 ) that is transcutaneously transmitted to the fascia, and method of forming the shock wave (electrohydraulic, electromagnetic, and piezoelectric) 32,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52] . One study found that satisfactory results were maintained five years following electromagnetic shock-wave treatment 43 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Extracorporeal shock-wave treatments have been applied to patients with chronic plantar fasciitis who have failed to respond to multiple conservative pharmacologic and therapeutic interventions [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] . Recent randomized, controlled stud- ies have been published but with varying results because of differences in study design, direction of the shock-wave delivery, energy levels, size (volume) of the focused energy ellipsoid (f 2 ) that is transcutaneously transmitted to the fascia, and method of forming the shock wave (electrohydraulic, electromagnetic, and piezoelectric) 32,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52] . One study found that satisfactory results were maintained five years following electromagnetic shock-wave treatment 43 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent randomized, controlled stud- ies have been published but with varying results because of differences in study design, direction of the shock-wave delivery, energy levels, size (volume) of the focused energy ellipsoid (f 2 ) that is transcutaneously transmitted to the fascia, and method of forming the shock wave (electrohydraulic, electromagnetic, and piezoelectric) 32,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52] . One study found that satisfactory results were maintained five years following electromagnetic shock-wave treatment 43 . Randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials for musculoskeletal applications of high-energy shock waves have been conducted in the United States 43,46 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[1][2][3][4] Although most cases respond well to such conservative therapy, some patients do not respond to this type of treatment or have recurrence of symptoms and may progress to surgical release. 5,6 Various surgical procedures for plantar fasciitis release exist, such as open surgery, [7][8][9][10] percutaneous release, and endoscopic surgery. [11][12][13][14] Skin trouble, nerve disturbance, infection, and persistent pain associated with prolonged recovery time are complications of open surgery.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%