2017
DOI: 10.4314/jasem.v20i4.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of <i>Escherichia coli</i> as indicator of point-of-use chlorination efficiency of drinking water

Abstract: ABSTRACT:In this study, the relevance of the presence of Escherichia coli in drinking water as an indicator of point-of-use chlorination efficiency is examined. The survival of clinical isolates of human enteric pathogenic bacteria (Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella typhi, Shigella dysenteriae, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus faecalis and Vibrio cholerae) as well as E. coli was monitored as a function of effective germicidal concentration and contact time. The inactivation kinetics… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EF-TU in V. cholerae is more sensitive to oxidative stress than E. coli EF-TU, suggesting EF-TU may increase chlorine susceptibility in V. cholerae (Wholey and Jakob 2012). This aligns with our results, and those of previous work, that culturable V. cholerae undergoes greater log reduction than culturable E. coli after water chlorination, and has a lower contact time and disinfectant concentration factor (CT-factor) (Adebisi et al 2017;CDC 2019;Jones et al 1992).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…EF-TU in V. cholerae is more sensitive to oxidative stress than E. coli EF-TU, suggesting EF-TU may increase chlorine susceptibility in V. cholerae (Wholey and Jakob 2012). This aligns with our results, and those of previous work, that culturable V. cholerae undergoes greater log reduction than culturable E. coli after water chlorination, and has a lower contact time and disinfectant concentration factor (CT-factor) (Adebisi et al 2017;CDC 2019;Jones et al 1992).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Only one organism was evaluated for potential surrogacy. Of the limited existing research on surrogates for V. cholerae, two studies demonstrated promising findings with E. coli in suspension testing, thus we chose to focus on E. coli to expand that work to surface disinfection (Adebisi et al 2017;Jones et al 1992). Following WHO recommendations for surface disinfection in outbreak settings, we tested with a chlorine compound (NaDCC), which prior work has shown to be equivalent to other chlorine compounds in disinfection efficacy of E. coli and V. cholerae (Gallandat et al 2017;String et al 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings comply with Fouad et al (2017aFouad et al ( , 2017c and Keeley et al (2014Keeley et al ( , 2016 who recorded that the recovered coagulants act as fresh coagulants, showing nearly the same water quality except for organic characteristics. Focusing on the bacterial count in the treated water, however, the key factors influencing the bacterial count reductions are the disinfectant dose and contact time (Adebisi et al, 2016), and coagulant efficacy contributes greatly in achieving efficient disinfection (Branz et al, 2017). Therefore, bacterial count was considered as one of the parameters evaluating the coagulant efficiency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Access to safe drinking water has improved over the last decades in most parts of the world, but approximately 1.1 billion people still lack access to safe potable water, and over 2.6 billion worldwide lack access to adequate sanitation which causes water-borne diseases (Ademola et al, 2011;Adebisi et al, 2016). In Nigeria, majority of the rural populace do not have access to potable water (Oyedeji and Moninuola, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%