2020
DOI: 10.1007/s13246-020-00936-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of magnetic resonance angiography as a possible alternative to rotational angiography or computed tomography angiography for assessing cerebrovascular computational fluid dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have demonstrated the variances in CFD simulation results of IAs among CTA, TOF-MRA, and 3DRA models, which might be due to unique geometric characteristics for different imaging modalities 24–26. In this study, hemodynamic differences were also detected between silent MRA and 3DRA models.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…Previous studies have demonstrated the variances in CFD simulation results of IAs among CTA, TOF-MRA, and 3DRA models, which might be due to unique geometric characteristics for different imaging modalities 24–26. In this study, hemodynamic differences were also detected between silent MRA and 3DRA models.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…With the scalars from patient-specific computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation, the values of area under receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) ranged from 0.820 to 0.967 (Fujimura et al, 2018;Misaki et al, 2021;Nambu et al, 2019;Umeda et al, 2017). The 3D information, however, was suppressed following averaging or maximizing, and its fidelity was strongly influenced by the accuracy of the geometry, boundary conditions, and parameters of the model in CFD simulation (Chnafa et al, 2018;Hoi et al, 2006;Lim et al, 2020;Steinman et al, 2019;Yoneyama et al, 2020) and the resolution in non-invasive measurement (Brindise et al, 2019;Roloff et al, 2019). This uncertainty resulted in "confounding factor dissemination" when quantifying clinical issues with hemodynamic parameters (Kallmes, 2012;Rayz et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 At the carotid bifurcation, 10 the unique geometric shape produces disordered hemodynamics, with a strong turbulence characteristic of disturbed flow, which plays a major role in the cause of intimal hyperplasia and atherosclerosis. 11 Currently, most research on carotid artery mechanics is based on computer model reconstruction, fluid dynamics analysis, image data post-processing, and in vitro material simulation techniques, [12][13][14][15] and so on. Nevertheless, not only are substantial individual differences found in the anatomical structure and course of carotid bifurcation, 16 but the establishment of an arterial wall model under physiological conditions still requires further exploration, while the blood flow belongs to non-Newtonian fluid, 17 which limits the accurate quantification of hemodynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%