Evaluation of manual-based cognitive-behavioral therapy for bulimia nervosa in a service setting

Tuschen‐Caffier, Brunna; Pook, Martin; Frank, Monika

doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(00)00004-8

Cited by 74 publications

(36 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In line with a transdiagnostic approach to eating disorders (Fairburn, Cooper, & Shafran, 2003), a similar bias for overweight women with and without BED could be assumed. Moreover, therapeutic approaches that aim at the establishment of such a balance significantly decrease body dissatisfaction in women with extreme shape and weight concerns (Delinsky & Wilson, 2006), with AN and BN (Kaye et al, 2005;Tuschen-Caffier, Pook, & Frank, 2001;Vocks, Legenbauer, Wachter, Wucherer, & Kosfelder, 2007) and obese adolescents (Jansen et al, 2008).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Explicit memory bias for positively valenced body-related cues in women with binge eating disorder

Svaldi

Bender

Tuschen‐Caffier

2010

Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Explicit memory bias for positively valenced body-related cues in women with binge eating disorder

Svaldi

Bender

Tuschen‐Caffier

2010

Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Usually, food exposures [33,34] have a duration of up to 2 h [16,35,36]. Future studies should investigate whether even shorter exposures may lead to clinically significant change of psychological as well as physiological reactions to food.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Food Exposure in Patients with Bulimia nervosa

Neudeck

Florin²,

Tuschen‐Caffier³

2001

Psychother Psychosom

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The aim of the study was to investigate psychological and physiological responses of bulimic patients to the repeated presentation of food cues. Method: On 2 subsequent days, 48 bulimic women (DSM-IV) were confronted with high- or low-caloric food for 20 min. A control group (n = 24) was exposed to high-caloric food once. Blood sugar levels were manipulated with a glucose load. Results: High-caloric food only elicited increases in urge to binge, subjective and physiological stress in the first session. During the second session, reported urge to binge and subjective stress was significantly lower. Bulimic patients confronted with high-caloric food showed higher subjective and physiological stress in the first session compared to bulimic patients confronted with low-caloric food. In the second session, they reported more subjective stress and urge to binge, compared to the low-caloric group. Blood sugar levels did not affect psychological and physiological responses. Discussion: The results are discussed in terms of the conditioning model of binge eating model, habituation models and implications for exposure therapy.

show abstract

“…Furthermore, 1 year later, CMHC patients had maintained their treatment gains (Stuart et al, 2000). In the years since the publication of this report, a number of benchmarking studies have appeared in the psychotherapy literature testing the generalizability of treatments with strong outcomes in efficacy studies, including exposure and response prevention for obsessive-compulsive disorder (Franklin et al, 2000), CBT for bulimia (Tuschen-Caffier et al, 2001), cognitive therapy for depression (Merrill et al, 2003), and CBT for social phobia (Lincoln et al, 2003). In general, these investigations have demonstrated the robustness of evidencebased treatments in a variety of patient, provider, and setting parameters.…”

Section: A Brief History Of Benchmarkingmentioning

confidence: 97%

Benchmarking the Effectiveness of Psychotherapy: Program Evaluation as a Component of Evidence-Based Practice

Weersing

2005

Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psych

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The medical director of a child guidance center is starting a new treatment program. Following intense media coverage of adverse events associated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, depressed teens and their families are refusing to accept pharmacotherapy. The director has paid for three social work therapists to attend a cognitivebehavioral therapy (CBT) workshop, and these clinicians will begin seeing depressed teens next week. The director, however, is worried. From what she has heard and read, CBT has a good track record in treating depression although it may work best in combination with the medications that her patients are refusing to take. In addition, she wonders how well will CBT work when delivered by her social work therapists to the population of poor, Spanishspeaking teens served by the clinic?In this example, the medical director struggles with how to bring the principles of evidence-based practice (EBP) to bear on the problem of program evaluation. She is asking a critical, pragmatic question: Does therapy work, here, now, and with my patients? This column discusses a method for addressing this query that uses the results of published psychotherapy clinical trials as a gold-standard benchmark against which the outcomes of practice can be measured (McFall, 1996). This methodology views research evidence on the effects of psychotherapy as, literally, a base-solid ground that researchers and practitioners can use as a foundation when trying to solve problems, whether theoretical or applied.

show abstract

Evaluation of manual-based cognitive-behavioral therapy for bulimia nervosa in a service setting

Cited by 74 publications

References 15 publications

Explicit memory bias for positively valenced body-related cues in women with binge eating disorder

Explicit memory bias for positively valenced body-related cues in women with binge eating disorder

Food Exposure in Patients with Bulimia nervosa

Benchmarking the Effectiveness of Psychotherapy: Program Evaluation as a Component of Evidence-Based Practice

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About