2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2010.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of measurement uncertainty using mixed distribution for conducted emission measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, two ways to evaluate the standard uncertainties are usable according to the nature of the sources of uncertainty; a type A assessment of the standard uncertainty is carried out by a statistical analysis of series of observations and a Type B assessment of standard uncertainty which is based on scientific judgment, using all available information about the possible variability of the input quantity such as the manufacturer's specifications, data provided by calibration certificates, other certificates, experimental data, etc [15,16].…”
Section: Eurachem/citacmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, two ways to evaluate the standard uncertainties are usable according to the nature of the sources of uncertainty; a type A assessment of the standard uncertainty is carried out by a statistical analysis of series of observations and a Type B assessment of standard uncertainty which is based on scientific judgment, using all available information about the possible variability of the input quantity such as the manufacturer's specifications, data provided by calibration certificates, other certificates, experimental data, etc [15,16].…”
Section: Eurachem/citacmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known how different parameters can affect electrical components, affecting not only their nominal value, but also increasing their degradation over time and consequently reducing their estimated lifetime [1][2][3][4]. Furthermore, frequency has a strong impact on electrical components and parasitic components can give rise to problems that were not considered in the design phase [5][6][7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The need to define the measurement uncertainty comes from the fact that every component which constitutes any kind of system shows a nominal value which is not fixed, but rather changes according to different probability distribution functions (PDFs) [11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is also used in mechanical and dimensional measurements, such as: gear measurement instruments (Kost et al, 2015), dynamic coordinate measurements (Garcia et al, 2013) and Brinell hardness testing (Leyi et al, 2011). In the field of physics and electricity, applications are found for nonlinear physical laws (Vujisić et al, 2011), for passive electrical circuits (Stanković et al, 2011) and for conducted emission measurement (Kovačević et al, 2011). In the field of chemistry, this method was used for the estimation of plutonium (Heasler et al, 2006), in the determination of Pb content in herbs (Lam et al, 2010) and in the measurement of nitrogen content in liquid fuel (Theodorou et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%